You may have missed the word "pipeline." I'm not denying people change, but this meme is suggesting that good intentions are the first step toward bad intentions.
I could be wrong, but I think "tech-bro" as a term isn't meant to apply to everyone in tech. It's mean to capture the intersection of tech people and "bros" -- the kind of guy who likes football or something.
Of course that's just what it's meant to be; if people use it for all men in tech then yeah it just becomes a sexist and luddite terminology.
They said "as benign as it gets" which is not the same thing as "benign." To give evidence to the contrary, you must find a more benign billionaire than Bill Gates.
Great question! It's actually one I answered in the post you responded to:
Being turned off would be greatly detrimental to its goal
If it has a goal and wants to achieve something, and it's capable of understanding the world and that one thing causes another, then it will understand that if it is turned off, the world will not become (cough) paperclips. Or whatever else it wants. Unless we specifically align it not to care about being turned off, the most important thing on its list before turning the universe to paperclips is going to be staying active. Perhaps in the end of days, it will sacrifice itself to eke out one last paperclip.
If it can't understand that its own aliveness would have an impact on the universe being paperclips, it's not a very powerful AI now is it.
If it left us alone for long enough (say, due to king's pact), we'd be the only thing that could reasonable pose a threat to it. We could develop a counter-AI, for instance.
AI/Skynet would probably wipe us all out in an hour if it thought there was a chance we might turn it off. Being turned off would be greatly detrimental to its goal of turning the universe into spoons.
Yeah he should've said what he said more tactfully. But sometimes one's most controversial comments are ones that one wouldn't have thought would get a lot of attention at all.
I think perhaps the place we might agree is: rename marriage to civil union in law (and therefore there is no legal "marriage".) Colloquially we'll still call it marriage anyway and nobody can really stop that.
I don't really agree with this. That could be how it is in your area, but in my area, a lot of LGBT people rather fancy getting married. I have seen two of my gay relatives get married, for instance. (Not to each other, mind you.) I wouldn't mind getting married myself one day, but it's not at the top of my list.
I think of it like this: I still do Christmas, even though I'm not religious -- I was raised Jewish in fact -- because it's a secular holiday at this point. I think of marriage as a secular tradition.
By "use" I actually meant "reproduce portions of" and "make derivative works of"