This is something I don't think people are internalizing about (agentic) AI. Its disruption doesn't stem from its "intelligence", but in its persistence. We are very rapidly approaching an era of infinite agency, but our entire society is designed around people having limited agency. Everything assumes that a vast majority of people won't bother to use their agency. Sending complaints to local government agencies, waiting in line for concert tickets, starting an online business, submitting pull requests, etc.; they all assume most people won't bother; they'll choose to use their limited agency on something else. Agentic AI will blow that all up; you'll be able to point the AI at a goal on your behalf and not think about it again.
AI slop will hypothetically vanish as AI improves, but that doesn't do anything to address the fact that we'll all have effectively infinite agency.
It negates any map that was designed specifically to counteract racism, because considering racism is, by definition, taking race into account. (According to their logic)
Notably, specifically designing a district map to give a specific political party an edge is not illegal. This will be a race to the bottom and all voters should be pissed. The natural end result will be states with GOP-controlled legislature will craft maps such that only the GOP can win and Dems will have to do the same to even hope to keep the playing field level.
People all across the political spectrum will lose any chance at representation, depending on how their political leanings compare with the legislature of their state.
That context isn't important at all, unless you're implying that the correction is wrong or misleading.
I think it's useful to bring attention to the fact that this isn't water being used by the data center for operations, but for its construction.
And let's be real, there's a ridiculous amount of misinformation surrounding co-called "AI", both pro and con. Someone providing context and clarification isn't something I'd complain about. (With the caveats above.)
Has it occurred to you that all the searching in the world can't help you find a website that isn't indexed?
Obscure errors especially may not exist for you to find, and depending on how small and obscure the music is you're looking for, it may not exist or be properly indexed.
There is significant overlap between those two things. Depending on how old you are, you may not remember a time when people didn't know how to search for information on the Internet; it was a skill people needed to learn. These days it's pretty difficult to mess up finding what you want to find on the Internet, as the tools have been refined so much that it's nearly idiot proof.
It's much the same way with using an LLM. We're at the stage where using an LLM is a skill many people don't have, and it leads to incorrect outputs. I have no doubt that the same refinement will happen for LLMs as happened with search engines.
I was recently looking into this myself, and I saw someone recommend FileFlows, but it was recommended for ease of setup/use, not because it's open source. Figured I'd mention it, but note that I haven't had a chance to check it out yet.
The issue is what mechanism could be used to force Google to pay, but also prevents Google from saying "yeah, we just won't provide any links to those sites at all".
Are they going to force Google to index those sites against their will? If so, how? Even if they could, would you really want that? Will it be just as cool for Russia to force Google to index whatever it wants, too? Are they just going to take money from Google no matter what, and give it to the news sites, even if Google isn't indexing them?
Sorry for the delayed response. I didn't see a notification.
I am pretty sure you're wrong about this but I'm unsure where you're pulling this definition from, so maybe that would help sort it out.
In 1530, could a 14 year old "have sex"? Are you leaning on morality to define sex this way, or legality?
To be clear, this semantic argument feels much more like virtue signalling than anything else, but I'm open to be convinced it's more than that.