jeffw

Nothing like disingenuous criticism to make you look like an ass. There are so many things to criticize WaPo for recently, why post straight up lies? For example, this outlet claims that they buried the Musk hand gesture. By the time the article they published on 1/23 (linked as a source in this article), WaPo has numerous articles posted about the hand gesture, not “one” as this outlet claims.

Id wager there are other bogus claims here but I only bothered to investigate one.

Edit: yeah, their “bombshell” evidence links to an article that says the govt spends too much money and the pentagon needs to be reined in and we need to raise the income limit for taxes on social security. Big endorsement of Musk /s

These people have access to sensitive govt information

Also what’s your mother’s maiden name haha just say it punk

It definitely wasn’t the only censored word. Kendrick skipped more than a few words overall. But it was far and away the most obvious one

I assumed it was because of the lawsuit that is already pending. I don’t think “pedophile” is a censored word

I’m just mad he didn’t say the word “pedophile”

It is though. Like I said, certain tasks are important, but others are overreach (specifically what they do with censorship and control of certain airwaves)

The FCC is like the one agency they could shrink

I get it, it’s too late to go back to an era where radio waves were free, but the FCC has way too stringent rules. They should worry about things like protecting critical devices from interference and ensuring companies don’t fuck people over (monopolies, robocalls, stuff like that)

Most lottery winners don’t become influencers though. Nothing will change

You’re going to get yelled at by lefties on any instance. That’s how federation works.

They said they called it off because of “media leaks” basically

Edit: https://abcnews.go.com/Politics/post-inauguration-ice-raids-starting-tuesday-sources/story?id=117827142

"We're reviewing any plans in Chicago because of the leak," Tom Homan told ABC News, adding that the news reports may have potentially put officer safety at risk.

Wild. When you dig into those poll results it is sadly clear that Kamala only would’ve won by pivoting right.

It’s typical for tech companies to organize as nonprofits and then restructure because they are losing cash?

Not sure if I’m misunderstanding you or what part you think is typical

So you’re going to go meet a beautiful person and initiate romance then?

Probably trying to upsell you a premium service but I’ve never had anyone call me over that, only seen letters/ads.

Edit: just read the other comments here and realized it could also be because of your utilization. You might have been flagged as being high risk, so they are targeting you for the product.

Drugs. All of them.

Whatever you do, never take a pill. Especially vitamin C. Or Zyrtec.

What does sex have to do with romance?

Also, are you aromantic? Why won’t you ever experience this?

Concierge service is usually separate from traditional health insurance. Idk what it means in the context of an existing plan.

Do they specify “I am from x company” or do they say “I am calling about your health insurance”?

lol so this is cherry-picked data. They link to a source that shows if Kamala had been more conservative in these areas, she would’ve had more support:

Immigration Fossil fuels Ukraine (withdrawing support)

It also said that 14% said her support of Israel made them more likely to vote for her. 9% said it made them less likely.

Maybe MOST importantly is that the issues the polled on, in order of importance to voters, shows Gaza ranks LAST in importance. Shame on Common Dreams, I expected better.

It’s so easy to lie with data, thanks for illustrating that

Edit: okay, this is hilarious. Even the source they linked is wrong: “New Poll Shows Gaza Was #1 Issue For Biden 2020 Voters Who Did Not Vote For Harris”

Then the actual data disproves this. Neither for Biden voters who switched or Biden voters who backed Harris, it was not the top. For those who switched, it was NEAR the top. For others, it was dead last.

Also, the poll is exclusive to swing states.

Skimmed the article and I’m still confused. Why can’t people just link to the actual data?