Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I

interdimensionalmeme

@ interdimensionalmeme @lemmy.ml

Posts
8
Comments
1062
Joined
5 yr. ago

  • Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy

    Jump

  • Plus we can have AI read a post history for us and either make a reputational decision, or highlight in the interface how reputable or disreputable tye user is. You could have it collapse but not delete a user's comment and you could also lower and raise the bar of acceptibility at anytime. We need better tools than a polished BBS descendant.

  • Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy

    Jump

  • What really matters is the back-to-nose distance, this gives you the head-per-chop ratio but also drives the max-head-per-chop value which itself depends on the blade weight and max blade height which limited by the ceiling height if inside or the max free standing of the pillars if outside.

  • Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy

    Jump

  • There was not a 8 billion people supply chain back then.

  • Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy

    Jump

  • Will not happen on lemmy, structurally the power flows from instance owners and their delegates. Their power to shape discourse and association and to steer thoughts of the lemmy user will not be relinquished. The first fundamental block to this, like on mastodon, is their power to silence and eliminate users from lemmy history without recourse and with transparency at their discretion.

  • Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy

    Jump

  • I did my research at the heritage foundation.

  • Decentralized Social Media Is the Only Alternative to the Tech Oligarchy

    Jump

  • Communication is not for sale.

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • This is a great way to do nothing and let the problem fester. The attitude behind every rotten thing we have to deal with now.

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • 1/6 of all lemmy users are on that server. It has been the default recommended server long enough that nothing can be taken for granted about the users of that server.

    And this idea that one should give a microsecond of attention to which server to create an account on, is why mastodon is a desert that even twitter refugee don't want to go to.

    Lemmy instances should not even know the usernqmes of their users. User accounts should just be encrypted files being served.

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • There is 0% possibility the US gov cannot publish a certificate in all major browser that could usurp any dns from a registrar in a country under US dominance.

    Just because they haven't used that card uet doesn't mean they can't. The clearnet is already a surveillance cesspit. There is no escaping state forces anywhere on it.

    It's just the europeans being complacent about leaving this capability to the americans. For now they depend un US cyber command for it, and they won't do it to google for the sole benefit of europeans.

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • TLS certificate infrastructure is a major national security concern. Sure, for religious reasons it can be controlled by a private entity but the governement is certaily already pullibg all the strings there. The problem in the EU is this control is in America now. So they need to wake up and have their own. Then the can enforce a google ban and seamless redirect to search.eu or whatever. The important thing is to both block google while not breaking the search button on everything that foolishly hardcoded google.com in the code.

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • One of the reasons to create a domestic redirect of google.com

  • Sweeping Cyber Security Order

    Jump

  • Oops a billionaire just bought the city square. Enjoy your complimentary freedom in the designated free speech zone. Just don't protest annoyingly...

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • Google is a threat. They should know they can be subverted if they continue in their ways with the questionably ethical human experimentation (for instance, undisclosed A/B testing including full context)

  • Sweeping Cyber Security Order

    Jump

  • What shall I write on the casings?

  • Sweeping Cyber Security Order

    Jump

  • Buy your free speech, just 16$ per month! No being mean to Elon allowed!

    Even the nazi had free speech if you keep it in your.

    What a farcical and useless understanding of "free speech" you have.

    "It's not censorship when Elon does it"

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • Ok but my grandma can't

  • Sweeping Cyber Security Order

    Jump

  • What about privacy and actual freedom of speech or curtailling corporate cyberintrusion into oir lives? Any of that?

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • I don't think anyone could legally compete with hydro not that they could because we invested as a society into exploiting pur natural ressources for the common good of our population rather than the good of some dickhead.

    Result: cheapest electricity price on the continent.

  • Google decides it won't comply with EU fact-checking law

    Jump

  • Google neither competes fairly nor provides a good service. We have to endure them because they have made investment in a competitor uneconomical.