Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
5
Comments
296
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • erdogan is a dictator

  • You do not fight oligarchs by using their social media when plenty of alternatives are available

  • It's easier than you think as i said already it happens in europe all the time.

  • The third party.

    Then it's not mathematically impossible that a third party wins you are making up bullshit. In europe brand new parties win elections all the time

  • Do you understand that both the red and blue party are backing the genocide? If your relatives were dying in gaza would you really vote for the lesser evil of the two, or would you supporting a party that actually want to stop the genocide?

    • Democrats 20%
    • Republicans 20%
    • Third party 60%

    Who wins in this scenario?

  • Your phone number is tied to your identity, there are no reasons to ask it to begin with.

  • There's a big amount of red voters unhappy with trump but that voted for him because in their eyes he's "lesser evil" than blue and because "there's no alternative".

    Once a third party gain enough traction to break the narrative that only red or blue can win it will be a landslide. In europe third parties wins all the time.

  • Signal is centralized and require a phone number to register, it's not private at all.

  • how is it mathematically impossible?

  • If dead people had something to say i don't think they would be happy about the parties that backed their genocide

  • probably not but breaking the red and blue duopoly can do some good.

  • Making the correct choice has nothing to do with feeling better than others, it simply is the correct thing to do.

  • What's your plan to stop the genocide? Begging the parties behind it to stop it?

  • Unsupporting the red and blue party is the correct thing to do and what will ultimately lead to a positive change. The duopoly party narrative is holding on a really thin line because everyone is unsatisfied on both sides, in europe third parties win plenty of times.

    If you throw your trash out of the window that isn't going to change world pollution but you don't do that because we live in a society and everyone is supposed to do his part.

  • Yes there was: not voting red or blue

  • Stopping the genocide was never a choice in the table with the red and blue party

  • They have always wait for US green light to do it and they have always had it

  • Probably they didn't change at all but their influence scaled up. Lying to a person or to a million people doesn't carry the same weight