Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
192
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I agree with you, but I feel that you're glossing over the bigger point. In my view, you're right about the way most social media users behave, but that behavior is also bound to slowly change as people get a better grip on how it is effecting them in a negative way. We as a society are learning the hard way about how toxic social media can be.

    Most people are dumb and they don't have time to consider whether something is better or worse, especially something as new as social media. But when they start to notice other people (like us!) doing something differently and having a better experience, they eventually catch on and change their behavior.

    It's like how it took a long time for people to stop smoking cigarettes, but once the tide turned it happened within a couple generations. Or wearing seat belts, or any other new, cool technology/product that people eventually started to understand better and adapt to after a few generations. Social media is like that, and we are simply the early adopters of a more humane and healthy form of social media. It takes a long time, but people will eventually start to understand how corporate social media is an unhealthy and exploitative habit, and this decentralized, community driven model is a much better experience.

  • We've kinda been hibernating since July 2023, with the userbase rapidly declining from that peak and then remaining nearly constant for the entirety of 2024. Honestly it's quite impressive that we held such a steady monthly user count for the past year.

    But now with all the publicity around the fediverse, we are beginning to pick up some organic momentum again. We've grown by about 2k active users in January (~5% growth). Keep that up for a few more months and it will start to become noticeable with more activity, which should hopefully start a positive feedback loop.

    Regarding finding and subscribing to communities on other instances, I'm pretty sure this tool addresses that problem fairly effectively.

    https://lemmy-federate.com/

    You may want to add your instance to that.

  • Pixelfed's monthly userbase has gone from 15k to almost 300k in the past month. Absolutely massive for the fediverse.

    I'll probably try it out eventuallyTM

  • That's a very interesting take, I hadn't thought of it in those terms before but I think you're onto something. I definitely agree that people have a limited capacity to receive/understand abstract ideas, and therefore each transmission from human to human loses some of the original meaning, and also gets mixed together with some other meanings imparted by each individual in the chain. The analogy of ideas to living organisms facing evolutionary pressure to reproduce is very cool.

    I also see what you're saying about crazy religions that have moderated with time, but I'm not entirely sure about drawing a distinction between bad ideas that tend to moderate for the better and good ideas that tend to moderate for the worse. Intuitively, I do agree that ideas such as Christianity and Marxism are better than phony religions such as Mormonism and Scientology. But that requires a whole bunch of other arguments to support conclusively.

    I feel like it's really the same process going on with all abstract ideas as they spread among human societies, and it would be somewhat reductive to describe them as changing according to any firm law, or getting better or worse. Rather, it's probably more accurate to say that they change and adapt according to the specific chain of humans through which they are transmitted, which causes them to become more moderate and simpler in the vast majority of cases, but also has the possibility of augmenting or intensifying them in some ways, albeit rarely.

    This allows you to take into account that some bad or irrational or wrong ideas can also be transmuted and reframed into good ideas in an instant, and vice versa. I am thinking about the work of great artists who are able to evoke a certain perspective such that a wrong idea might actually help us to understand something true or beneficial, and conversely of the despot or authoritarian who fancies themself as following a noble ideal, but ends up causing immense suffering in service of that good idea.

  • You've gotten a bunch of solid answers already, but I just want to chime in with some food for thought.

    In my view, Marxism is itself a form of religion. Instead of having faith in a higher power, a Marxist chooses to have faith in an ideological system that lacks definitive evidence of its accuracy or applicability to human societies. It certainly sounds much more plausible and rational to our ears than traditional religions with their paradoxical and seemingly arbitrary assertions, but it nonetheless requires some degree of faith.

    The specific interpretation of historical events and human social behavior that Marx asserts is by no means certain, and requires that you have faith that Marx was correct in a majority of his arguments.

    The doctrine of Marxism was famously critiqued by Karl Popper due to his belief that it was unfalsifiable, and thus unfit to be described as a scientific theory. I'll quote a relevant passage from the Wikipedia article here

    In his early years Popper was impressed by Marxism, whether of Communists or socialists. An event that happened in 1919 had a profound effect on him: During a riot, caused by the Communists, the police shot several unarmed people, including some of Popper's friends, when they tried to free party comrades from prison. The riot had, in fact, been part of a plan by which leaders of the Communist party with connections to Béla Kun tried to take power by a coup; Popper did not know about this at that time. However, he knew that the riot instigators were swayed by the Marxist doctrine that class struggle would produce vastly more dead men than the inevitable revolution brought about as quickly as possible, and so had no scruples to put the life of the rioters at risk to achieve their selfish goal of becoming the future leaders of the working class. This was the start of his later criticism of historicism. Popper began to reject Marxist historicism, which he associated with questionable means, and later socialism, which he associated with placing equality before freedom (to the possible disadvantage of equality).

    I must admit that my Marxist and socialist leanings have been significantly shaken during my time on Lemmy, where it appears that the tankie servers tend to reproduce the very same flaws that have been evident in the majority of communist and socialist nation states that have existed thus far. Namely, a lack of free discourse, a refusal to question and debate, and a blind focus on ideological purity to the extent that truth and pragmatism become secondary or entirely irrelevant concerns. One begins to question whether such tendencies are not in fact a perversion, as they are so often framed, but instead an inevitable outcome of strict adherence to Marxist doctrine.

    I realize that many will probably argue that tankies do not represent Marxist beliefs accurately, but it seems to me that as Marxist thought becomes more dominant within any particular group or society, that specific brand of Marxism seems to overwhelm and outcompete more libertarian varieties.

    Circling back to the original question, this is perhaps not dissimilar to the discrepancy between Christianity as originally conceived in the New Testament and the subsequent manifestation of Christianity as an organized religion in the real world, which seems to bear little resemblance to the teachings of Christ.

    It's almost like no matter how noble the abstract thoughts and philosophies might be, human beings will find a way to misinterpret them and repurpose them in service of horrific and selfish actions.

  • Of course you're not one to leave a wizard cat image link unclicked. Well played sir

  • That doesn't sound right, but I don't know enough about micro plastics to dispute it

  • Nice. It's amazing that I'm still slowly piecing together my reddit subscriptions on Lemmy almost 2 years later. There's another classic one that I hadn't yet found, thanks.

    And remember, memes can be more salubrious than therapy 🫠

  • Great tip! Thanks

  • Just Google it. Lol but seriously.

    IIRC there's like the evolution of dance, Charlie bit my finger, and more? Idk.

  • What in the actual fuck?!?!

    That's amazing, I don't understand this shit but thanks for the master key 🙌

  • Now you're making (good) jokes? Nice!

  • Let's just say I'd rather be with a man than this bear. But the bear is gone.

  • For the curious, it was because I tried to put capital letters in the community name. Don't blame sh.itjust.works, blame Lemmy.

    But also blame yourselves for not donating enough, coding isn't easy or free.

  • Sunk cost fallacy goes brrr

  • Yeah fuck algorithms, all my friends hate algorithms.

    Not being sarcastic, I genuinely feel that way.

    Btw you may be interested in !lain@sh.itjust.works despite the fact that it's dead. Or maybe your username is completely unrelated. Worth a shot.

  • Not at all, I use Firefox and normal Lemmy-UI 95% of the time. It just works for me.

    But sometimes I use the Sync app, because I paid to remove ads and I'm gonna get my money's worth, so help me God.

  • It's not working right now. Surely you can at least wait until tomorrow. If I can't make it by then, then it's my bad