Nostr pubkey: npub1wamvxt2tr50ghu4fdw47ksadnt0p277nv0vfhplmv0n0z3243zyq26u3l2
Incorrect, and seems like shallower projection / more embarrassingly dumb gaslighting than you've mostly been doing.
Any evidence for your claim that lemmy.world mods were pressured into this?
Yeah, but why did you put this right after a quote of yet another place where you ignored what I said in yet another one of my replies?
If what is true?
I don't know, I'm not scrolling up to check.
No, just I’m not going to change my position.
That doesn't make "non-negotiable" an applicable term to inject when begging someone to do something for you, lmao
Can you show me some examples of the USA doing this?
Too tired of your shit to read the part where you quoted what you're asking for examples of, let alone hold your hand through Google searches.
Hamas.ps was first mentioned by you, not me.
Didn't ask. I asked why you brought up the topic we were discussing, in which Hamas.ps had been one of the subtopics.
Why did you just make me repeat that? Just to abusively waste my time and energy, right?
How else is it going to get done?
I don't know, is it? Why are you asking like I would know?
How else do you plan to get Lemmy on TOR?
I don't, why are you asking like I do? Just to abusively waste my time and energy, right?
I didn’t say it was.
But I correctly pointed out that it's not whatever you implied.
But you still get banned, and the posts deleted.
Didn't ask, don't care. Why waste time typing that?
So you think that’s something that is missing here for the final piece of the puzzle?
What do you mean?
People feel the need, and want, to discuss inciting violence against politicians, public figures and whoever else?
Are you asking? You don't know?
No, I’m not.
Yep, you are. You're just dishonest.
Your original post:
“Lemmy urgently needs federation between onion service instances and DNS addresses in order to actually do what most users seem to wish it would do: allow discussion outside what the corporate authorities allow, while outgrowing reddit & helping undo the damage social media has done to human communication.”
I'm guessing you copied and pasted that. Good job? Not reading it to check.
Doesn’t matter.
Didn't ask if it mattered to you.
That you misidentify the purpose of the Fediverse, and why people are here is precisely why your ideas aren’t interesting and even offputting to many people.
Incorrect. I don't do that, so it can't be the reason. And the reason is because a lot of users here are mentally ill.
No, you don’t understand disproving a negative.
Misuse of "no" since this wouldn't change what I said, if it was true.
Also not true. "Disproving a negative" is pretty basic English. I might not understand you using random words you don't know the meanings of, but I know the meanings of the words themselves.
You made the claim. You back it up.
Why? What do you get when you Google it? You keep ignoring these questions so far.
Where’s your evidence of a Lemmy instance being shut down by “the authorities”?
What do you get when you Google it? You keep ignoring this question so far.
Not an answer.
I didn't ask if it was.
Do you know what “disprove a negative” means?
Yep.
But I did.
I didn't ask if you did.
I want an answer.
I didn't ask if you do.
I don’t even think you know what you’re replying to at this point.
I didn't ask if you do.
You think they’d somehow be better if they weren’t censored? Both Twitter and 4chan have less rules than Reddit or Lemmy.
Not sure what you're trying to say here. Get better at typing.
No, I did not.
Is repeatedly lying making you feel better about any of this?
You made an accusation, I reject it.
Sounds like a you problem.
So should I report you?
I don't care, but your question baits me to say something you could try to use to justify getting me banned, which sucks. Try asking on nostr, where I can't be banned, if you want my answer.
That’s usually against instance rules.
Didn't ask.
What claims have I made? Be specific.
What's in it for me?
To be clear, that's a rhetorical question. I understand that you have nothing real to offer anyone.
No, you specifically said: “Because they’re glowies”. No nuance.
Misuse of "no" since this doesn't change what I said, which is still true.
Also, didn't ask.
What is your definition of “glowie” here?
The colloquial one, originating from Terry Davis.
My understanding is that it’s supposedly an undercover government agent.
Yep.
Got any evidence for this for lemmy.world mods?
Do you read what you type?
I’ll do whatever I like.
Didn't ask. You should stop putting your own statements in quote marks, it's weird.
And I wasn’t clarifying my statements, more noting your complaining about being asked to clarify.
Again, didn't ask, didn't finish reading this sentence, stopped at "more" since you keep refusing to explain why you wasted time typing things after I waste time reading them and ask why
No reason to believe they are “pressured”.
Incorrect.
You’ve never backed this up.
Incorrect again.
You don’t really use any words correctly. They’re all a bit off.
Incorrect yet again. I'm basically the most fluent English speaker alive (and quite monolingual).
No, people are not able to share CSAM on the Fediverse. Doing so gets your account banned.
What do you think "banned" means? It's not "killed in the past with time travel" or whatever you're implying.
What specific topics can you not say on the Fediverse, or indeed any website outside of TOR without the threat of being arrested?
According to Trevor Moore, it's illegal to say "I want to kill the President of the United States of America"
Your original post and comments seem to suggest the end-goal of the Fediverse is to get as big as Reddit, and that it failed due to being overly censorious.
Incorrect. You're aware that's not what I was suggesting, you're just making shit up and pretending it's how it "seems" because you're very dishonest.
It didn’t, and it is not the overall goal of the Fediverse.
Didn't ask.
Lemmy.world. You seemed to suggest they were somehow pressured into implementing rules against CSAM material.
OK, and?
Your memory is shocking.
Didn't ask. Also, read Small Gods (or honestly any book please)
You did not answer.
Not again, no, because I remembered it being answered where you asked it.
Burden of proof. Onus is on you.
I asked if there was a way that's true in this case. Is there?
I’m not going to stop.
I think you'll stop replying before me, even if you have to ban me and pretend that's me stopping replying.
Non-negotiable.
What do you mean? You have some way of forcing me to do what you want?
You have never backed up a single claim with a single source.
Incorrect.
You make claims, you back them up.
Correct, generally.
That’s how it works.
Clearly not for everyone. You're obviously not working this way right now. But I do, yes.
I meant are you of the position that the USA exercises its long arm to shut down websites all across the world.
I think you should rephrase that to "are you dumb enough to think the USA doesn't exercise its long arm to shut down websites all across the world?"
AI results.
OK, still sounds true, but kinda embarrassing to be quoting here out of nowhere.
I didn’t. You did.
Incorrect. Scroll up.
You bought Hamas.ps. being taken offline.
Didn't ask. I asked why you brought up the topic we were discussing, in which Hamas.ps had been one of the subtopics.
That your efforts here are completely useless.
Incorrect then.
Both of these things can’t be true.
Incorrect. I've only been saying true things, so without reading the part you were responding to here, I can assume it was two things I said which were both true.
If there’s enough interest, then go and make your own fork and edit of Lemmy to work in TOR.
Why would I do that?
Which is to say, no - you don’t.
This is you admitting you've asked and been answered multiple times, and still continued dishonestly repeating yourself.
Are you starting to break out of the dishonesty, or just getting sloppy?
And you’re making things up.
Incorrect.
The point is the moderators chose those rules, they weren’t pressured into them.
No, I asked more than once why you're pretending you can't remember any instance's rules right after you mentioned several from at least 2 instances.
My point was it seems like you're trying to confuse anyone reading this, which is weird, because you've already gone on an hours-long gish gallop and you can't necessarily assume anyone else will even read this far.
I'm not saying you shouldn't type long replies. You're worth people's time. Even if my reply was short it would be fine to give a long reply.
I am just exhausted with the number of replies I'm getting that seem to ignore everything I'm saying.
How does federation allegedly being broken mean that lemmy.blahaj can’t be an LGBTQ focused instance?
I don't know. I would bet that's not even true. Why do you ask?
How does federation allegedly being broken mean that slrpnk.net can’t be a solarpunk themed instance?
Again, I don't know. Again, I would bet that's not even true. Yet again, why do you ask?
Are you of the opinion that a “pro-censorship bubble” is somehow a single theme on its own and that there’s no difference between hexbear.net and maga.place?
Nope. I have no idea what hexbear.net or maga.place are, and overall don't even understand what you're asking.
What would distinguish an instance from each other in your mind?
Are you asking me for dictionary help again? Why can't you just check "distinguish" in a dictionary? I never said or implied I use it differently from the dictionary "in my mind"
Also, the federation system has no relevance here to the culture of the Fediverse. Even if the Fediverse was on TOR - it would not stop instances having federation standards.
Didn't ask, why waste time typing that stuff?
Didn't ask, don't care.
Why are you asking that like there's an answer?
A huge proportion of westerners have travelled by plane, and will do so again.
Didn't ask. Why waste time typing that?
How do you know they don’t need to be there in person?
Because they're too dumb to be needed on planes like the heart-transplant ones. They're a little too dumb to be the best medjet pilot and way too dumb to be a healthcare professional. Can't think of other possibilities where dumb people need jet engines.
Are you an anarcho-primitivist?
Sure.
As in it guts access points for people to share it, to sell it, to discover it. That has impacts on the business.
Didn't ask. Why waste time typing that?
Your claim that sites removing CSAM makes it harder to catch pedophiles.
What about it? Did you ask if I had a source for that or something? That would be so dumb, but I can't think of anything you could ask about it that would be smart, it's just a simple self-explanatory statement that doesn't really open up any questions
Okay, so sometimes CSAM should be removed?
So you agree with some sites removing CSAM?
Why do you keep repeating questions I've already directly given you the answers to?
Not sure how this explanation relates to when you initially said: “reach a future where everyone’s positions are clarified”.
Didn't ask. Why are you complaining to me about your own lack of intelligence?
But your conclusion here implies that we shouldn’t ban or reducess access to anything ever, because people will just be drawn to TOR and watch it there.
I guess that is another argument against censorship, but worded so badly it's borderline incorrect. I assume you meant something that made more sense and it's just you being bad at typing again.
People posting about CSAM online tend to conceal their tracks, you know.
Correct.
Removing it or not isn’t going to necessarily make any difference to the likelihood of them being caught.
Incorrect.
But you don’t think any site should remove it. That’s my point.
Maybe you should try making points that are true, instead of pretending other people have said the opposite of what they've said, especially in text discussions where everyone can just read what's actually been said.
I happen to think child porn should be banned everywhere online, as much as possible. I don’t think any site should exist where people share it without consequence.
Didn't ask. Why waste time typing that here?
Seems you disagree.
Again, I didn't ask. I know my own positions. Why waste time typing that here?
It is, and could you screenshot that explanation and reply with it here because I don't remember it
You ignored everything I said. Was my reply too long, or does repeating yourself and ignoring what the other person says just fit for a liar?
Incorrect, and why did you put this after a quote of yet another one of my questions you’ve ignored?
Not what I asked, and why did you do it again?
Wouldn't it be better to actually ignore the questions instead of copying and pasting them but calling it "ignoring?"
You are very much a minority.
Didn't ask. Was there an actual reason to type this, or just more gaslighting and time wasting?
It's text, just read it again.
Why are you asking like I would know, and why are you putting it right after a quote of yet another question you're ignoring?
I didn't ask you to repeat yourself like this, why waste the time? Just because you're an abusive person, right?
Still really weird how you asked me for examples you had just given yourself. Care to try explaining that? Seems like you were just trying to be confusing, which is really weird when it's basically just us in this subthread.