Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)I
Posts
5
Comments
246
Joined
4 mo. ago

  • Big Kratom must have delivered that sweet crypto bribe.

  • Didn't Intel shitcan this entire line recently? I wanted one and can't find one in the wild.

  • Synergizing good EQ through the single pane of glass.

  • Cheap chinese Android tablet that was supposedly 8-core 16Gb ram. It's an absolute piece of shit, I think my S4 has more juice. It's a paperweight now after the Ali seller disappeared.

  • There's isn't a fucking chance Samsung is giving up data mining to move to GOS.

    Elon Musk would get his Communist Party membership first.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • My mother got attacked as a child and the rooster drove his spike through her foot, apparently. Maybe she's bullshitting me about that, I'm not sure if a rooster could manage to do that, but she sure hates roosters when the subject comes up.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • All roosters are problematic.

    You would think, in the many millennia of breeding chickens, we would have come up with silent roosters.

  • Zip, unzip it.

  • Now we know.

  • I never could get Technitium working correctly, it's like there's some switch you need to throw to actually get it to accept requests. I posted that and had a couple of other say the same thing. I didn't spend a lot of time with it, IMO a DNS server should serve requests out of the box.

    Went back to Unbound on my OPNsense router.

  • The ending was worth it.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • And take the chance he decides he needs the TV after all?

    No thanks.

  • Good thing you spend last year sucking his little mushroom, Jensen.

  • If you ignore the blathering of the author and just look at Dawkin's statements, it's obvious he's commenting philosophically on what he's seeing in the usage of the LLM and how we view consciousness. Language is how humanity expresses it's consciousness and when you take a hug swath of our written output and put it in a model, is it any surprise that it's output comes across as human-like?

    Assigning one's interpretation that Dawkins thinks the model is concious is a stretch and this article comes across as a bullshit smear piece against someone they don't like for whatever reasons those may be. I would imagine if Dawkins gave enough of a shit about this author to rebut them, you'd find he's fully aware of what LLMs are and are not.

  • Well, except the ones we just drove over cliffs with fire by the hundreds so we could harvest the good bits

  • Just get a rib steak and not have a stupid bone to deal with at twice the price.

  • I just imagine the dumbest thing someone can do in a situation and model for that.

    Icy roads? Well, the logical thing to do is make sudden moves at the last possible second without leaving a buffer. Stand on the throttle at every intersection, and start braking when you normally would in the middle of summer, of course.

    Honestly, you learn to predict unpredictability. Slight movements will tell you when someone is going to change lanes without a shoulder check or cross three lanes of traffic to make an exit that they could just have easily gone on to the next interchange without endangering themselves and others. Hell, I watch peoples eyes in their side mirrors look at me as they incorrectly judge how much space they have to insert themselves in front of me, when there's a kilometer of space behind me they could use instead.

  • Check out Qidi Ticks a few of the boxes and cheaper than Bambu