The best case for AI is that can heroicly solve problems that shouldn't exist in a first place in a well-managed company.
It can structure unstructured data, that should be structured. It can do simple coding where aboslutly no coder could be reached. It can sum up the red tape and produce red tape to meet complience requirement that were where created for the sake of the red tape alone.
If the work is important, it shoudn't be done by AI. If its busy work, it shouldn't exist in a first place. No one would need AI to summarize anything if everything was writen clearly.
And thats best case scenario when you don't count halucynations, errors, edge cases, company specyfic context - things that results in task taking more time after all the "oh it produced something and it looks good at a glance" cloud fall down.
If your company is getting a lot of value from AI than your company is trash.
How many headlines like that crubled under the shread of scrutiny? Why are we still humoring it? It's "women learned that she's pregnant from Google AdWords ad" deliberate propaganda.