Clinically depressed, chronically online,Socialist discordian statist for open science,Independent journalism and gay crime.
My Communities:
!Independent_Media@lemmy.today — Independent world journalism news feed.
!indy_news_canada@sh.itjust.works — Independent news from Canada.
!wildfeed@sh.itjust.works — Trash. Global, diverse news, reports, blogs and listicles.
!art_alchemist_guild@lemmy.today — Ask, share, learn and show off with the most DIY of artists.
!cool_rocks@lemmy.today — For cool rocks.
!everyday_socialism@lemmy.ml — For everyday socialism.
I keep making communities. Please help.
Other versions of me:
Former versions of me: (I don't check these accounts)
ceedoestrees@lemmy.worldicytrees@lemmy.todaytrash_goblin@piefed.zip
Seems too niche to be worth the time and money. However, advertising music only available for bitcoin on the dark web could work as a marketing tactic if the music appeals to that niche audience.
Thing is, I'm on the dark web, I use cryptocurrency and I like underground music, and this doesn't appeal to me. In my mind, I'm wondering why they didn't just build and host their own website instead, and sell their album for crypto. I would question why they only accept bitcoin if they're trying to be subversive. I go to the dark web for drugs, not music, and would be paying in Monero.
Alternatively, some artists have already NFT'd their music so people can purchase it for crypto. And, long before that, radiohead released In Rainbows independently through their website, which only took donations. So there are ways to skip the middlemen without the gimmick.
Could it work? Yeah, it could. I don't think it would work very well.