look i know that this gets a lot of hate but the current trajectory of "you need to prove your worth to the world to have a legitimate reason to exist" is just not sustainable. fuck all that "we support that artist", we should be supporting the person, whether they output art or not.
the current rage against AI is 90% driven by the idea that humans need to produce output sothat we can donate to them and give them money sothat they can live. and frankly, that's a dystopian idea in my eyes.
let's calculate: mayflower in 1618 to today, roughly 2018 is about 400 years. first child was mostly had around age 22 for most of that time, so that makes 400 / 22 ≈ 18 generations if you're descended from a long row of first-borns.
i mean this tell you everything that you need to know: as soon as the animation quality of a channel is good enough, it gets accused of being AI. what does this tell us about the quality of AI output?
yeah i basically fucked up and sent a direct link to my old account to a couple people that i know irl. after considering that this is not good, i had to make an alt.
also thanks for recognizing me, that makes me proud.
yeah i suspected it was actually an army project to prepare for the escalation of the cold war. that's why it was released after 1980 ... it was considered that it wasn't necessary anymore (to keep it in stockpile).
look i know that this gets a lot of hate but the current trajectory of "you need to prove your worth to the world to have a legitimate reason to exist" is just not sustainable. fuck all that "we support that artist", we should be supporting the person, whether they output art or not.
the current rage against AI is 90% driven by the idea that humans need to produce output sothat we can donate to them and give them money sothat they can live. and frankly, that's a dystopian idea in my eyes.