Skip Navigation

Posts
12
Comments
161
Joined
1 mo. ago

new account due to issues

  • An important point is that advertising, tracking, all the junk which the OP link demonstrates, is technically not possible in the gemini protocol.

    btw this is false. companies can still write a small text to advertise their product or create an advertisement image and distribute it over gemini. if the protocol allows data transfer, then it also allows distribution of ads.

  • needed to keep the umwashed masses away.

    and it also keeps me away. i don't like non-standard software for use-cases where existing software can already do the job well. that's just artificially fucked-up architecture. artificial scarcity

  • yeah i've heard about gemini but i don't like that they don't just work over HTTP (which would be entirely doable, btw). so i need to download a custom client or a browser plug-in, and i don't like it. i shouldn't have to install another 3rd-party software on my device just to interact with online content which the browser can already do perfectly fine.

  • And then an ad that covers the screen so that controls are not visible, and follows on scrolling.

    yeah and the "x" to close the ad is so small that you necessarily misclick (especially on mobile) and it opens another tab that redirects to the play store. now play store knows you're into this shit and keeps recommending it to you.

    • download our app (on mobile)
    • asks you to make an account every time you scroll down a little further (like instagram actually does in my browser)
    • article is 3 paragraphs long, afterwards 15 paragraphs of unrelated "recommended content"
    • videos start autoplaying
    • there's an annoying source of sound that you can't seem to track down
  • i was introduced to it by a lemmy user 2 weeks ago. joelle@blahaj.zone i think was their name?

  • 1 Pa = 1 N/m² (says wikipedia). So 200 N/m² would be 200 Pa.

  • would be a funny minecraft mod

  • understandable 🥲

  • i ... don't hate it

  • yeah ok that would make meat more expensive (which some people would argue is actually a good thing) but not plant-based food. (since plant-based food is less limited). which is an interesting observation ...

    yeah the housing crisis is something else. however i suspect that there are bigger factors at play here than just a limited supply ... theoretically, the housing supply could be arbitrarily big. the land area is not the bottleneck here (around 1% of the settleable land area of the world are used for housing, 97% is used for farming) and neither are the materials available ... it's more about market expectation (declining birthrate) making new housing construction seem short-sighted and not worth it in the long run. but this is a bit of a different issue and does not directly have to do with the buying power of the people, i think.

  • oh interesting, this is the first time that i see this. but it kinda makes sense, thanks.

  • as universal basic income doesn’t set universal basic buying power

    i disagree. food prices would not go up. prices are set by supply and demand. demand would not change. imagine a society with 1 million people. all of them need to eat, whether they earn their money through wages or get it through UBI. the demand for food does not change. i don't see a reason why supply would change either. so prices stay the same.

    do you have any rational argument against this?

  • i'm just gonna say it: your assumption that everybody should work is harmful. there's lots of people who can't work for medical reasons, but can't get a doctor's note either. for example, psychological syndromes are notoriously hard to diagnose.

    you'd just create another point of social friction with your attitude.

  • that's not really how people are, though. if people are happy, they generally see little reason to change something about their situation. everything else is delusional

  • i'm not sure why that is weird ... aren't they the same thing?

  • On top of that, you would pronounce 678 as six-hundred-seven-ty-eight in english ... guess what it is in german:

    Sechs-hundert-acht-und-sieb-zig (literally six-hundred-eight-and-seven-ty)


    i'm actually trying to change this point specifically because it irks me ... but i am sadly alone with it.

  • In german and english, the comma in numbers is swapped. So the number 123.45 in german would be written as 123,45 while ironically, the thing that we used to separate thousands from hundreds is also swapped. So one-thousand-four-hundred would be written as 1,400 in english but as 1.400 in german ...