No, actually. Spoiled here refers to the edibility by humans (aka the bacteria and toxic waste of said bacteria is below safe levels), and it's no longer living tissue given the animal has been killed and butchered.
This is the one case where I'd say fuck the "the parent's crimes aren't the responsibility of their children" and confiscate all the ill-earned money these fucks hoarded to compensate the victims.
I don't give a fuck if Ivanka goes destitute, if Don Jr can't fuel his coke habit, and so on, they were part of his crime organisation, they helped the orange twat cover up his child raping and murdering, they can pay for it too.
Local print shop that deals with large/poster prints. They'll usually be happy with a high enough resolution PNG, and can advise you on what's the best way to print in the physical size you want - what material to print onto, what printing approach to use, what finish to do, how to frame it, etc.
At that point, why bother with the setup of samba shares and nextcloud or syncthing or whatever else and not use VaultWarden with its built in sync over WireGuard/TailScale?
How do you recommend people sync between devices? What about devices that, for security reasons, do not allow flash drives or any external device to be plugged in?
At that quality of MP3 you'd really need either a track that specifically pushes the limits of the codec on technicalities, or a one in a million hearing + high precision monitors.
Albeit FLAC is generally a better option still because it compresses things losslessly, reducing raw file size 50-70% (comparable to MP3 at 128kbps bitrate) and is a royalty-free, meaning it can be freely implemented as a hardware codec.
For example, a bunch of microcontrollers in the ESP32 family have built in FLAC codecs that outperform their MP3 counterparts, meaning a FLAC library can be directly streamed to them, and with the right DAC combo, one can build inexpensive, low power adapters to hook their existing AV systems up to Sonos-style streaming. And with many AV systems supporting bidirectional RS232 (or other serial) communications for controlling the system and querying it's state, you can literally smartify them completely AND provide high quality audio streams to them.
I disagree with porn having no place on the Fediverse. A lot of amateur creators started their work on sites like Reddit, and the platform becoming unviable will push them to alternatives like Lemmy.
However I do agree that there should be some gateways to get to that point. Filtering instances/subcommunities that are marked directly as all-NSFW is a good first step (and should've been part of the protocol from day 1).
I also see why the default "filter out all NSFW content" filter is problematic (even though it is enforced by app stores on every mobile platform, sadly). A much better approach is to filter subcommunities and instances that are marked as entirely NSFW. That way e.g. news subcommunities can still post NSFW articles that have a wider reach, without anyone's primary feed getting slammed with porn and gore.
However I do agree that the available filtering is quite lacking. Tons of topics fall under NSFW, and disabling the filter brings the usual Russian Roulette of "will it be a titty or a beheaded guy or a 60yo bloke getting fisted?".
I've actually brought this up before, the Fediverse in general needs more granular NSFW sub-categories. Like, I have (or now with lemmynsfw being down, I guess, I had) a separate account for porn only. I've disabled NSFW filtering, but that doesn't mean I wanna see gore, rape, murder, animals being gutted, gruesome accident photos, cartel and ISIS execution videos and so on, I just don't want titties blurred in my main feed.
There was a "Golden Age" period of dating apps (that actually coincided much with the same "golden age" of many other services including streaming), where making money wasn't the goal, and the services actually served their official goal - pairing up people.
Problem is, any kind of dating app is self-detrimental for revenue, because if they serve that official goal, they're essentially nixing their own customer base. Because what's the point of a dating app? To find a person you can date, therefore you wouldn't need a dating app anymore. If it works as advertised, users spend bare minimum time on the platform before achieving their goals and leaving it.
This simply means that a dating platform is only viable in three scenarios:
the platform itself is an extension of an existing service, meaning it doesn't have to be financially successful on its own as long as it helps retain users and user-minutes (aka how much time a user spends on the entirety of the service, dating included). See e.g. Facebook's dating subsection.
there's VC funding, the app is in a growth phase, therefore the goals can stay as-is as long as userbase growth can be shown to the investors. Problem is, once the platform reaches critical mass and those investors want their money back, from then on, enshittification ensues.
the platform is driven not by VC funding or connected services but by a person's or a group of people's genuine interest in getting people paired up. There will be ads, there will be some paid features, but it cannot scale and is therefore doomed to fail on the long run (think pre-dating-app forums specialising on dating/partner-finding)
Most dating apps fall into the second category, and in fact if you do just a moment's research you'll notice that some 80-90% of the highest traffic (or most known) dating apps are under a single company. Yep, there's a literal dating apps monopoly going on that snuffs out competition, or buys them up and shuts them down, and so on.
In fact... I'm a mobile app engineer, and I've actually ended up applying to a few dating app startups. The one common denominator between these was not that they wanted to do something new, or wanted to engage people differently than the rest... no. It was that all of these companies were specifically made with a niche idea in mind with the sole purpose of creating a minimum viable product that catches the interest of this dating monopoly and buys the company out. Yup. My job would've been "make our company sellable". You can imagine how inspiring that is, especially when there's no offer of equity on the table...
the primary admin (whom would have system level access, not just admin role assigned in the Lemmy instance itself) hasn't been heard from since last October
sadly it's not uncommon for open source devs and maintainers to "disappear" from the community - a lot of these people do not share what they do with their friends and family, at least not the friends and family that could take over or even take steps in case of their passing. Accidents do happen, so do random events, so it's perfectly possible for such an admin to pass due to some unforeseen reason, and have nobody within their immediate circles who even knew about their role in maintaining the instance.
Oh, it will most certainly be used to maintain an up to date facial information database that can then be used by authorities who’ve already started facial recognition camera systems all over London (“for now”, only linked to criminal facial databases but obviously the goal is to gather as much data as possible in the near future).
How would this be detrimental in a world where money didn't exist?
The licence says CONMERCIAL exploitation, aka building a product to sell. In a world with no money, there's no commercialism. There's no commercial exploitation possible because the prerequisite for a commercial operation is commerce, aka the trade of products/produce for money.
Resist and find other ways to do the thing... which is literally what kids do.
Do you want your kids to be on Roblox with your knowledge and occasional oversight, or without your knowledge at all, without any parental control?