Skip Navigation

Posts
13
Comments
112
Joined
10 mo. ago

  • I don’t claim it to be common practice, just saying that it exists. That said, it may be “niche” in the grand scheme of things, but by no means do I think it’s small and insignificant. If anything, such codebases are typically foundational libraries in the giant stack of cards most other software engineers build.

    That's indeed very valid! As I said, I may have been a bit too harsh on the comment rule, definitely one to review properly <3

  • Hey! Yeah you are right, I may remove the >20% comments to line of code resulting in the code being 100% AI driven

    That said, you are obviously referencing a very niche sector, the vast majority of software engineering doesn't require that absurd amount of comments.. I can't stress enough how verbose a ratio of 20% comments to lines of code actually is lol

  • Happy to say as of today encryption is present in Jotty ♥️

  • Hi! I just randomly stumbled across this as I was searching for an old Jotty post I made (jotty developer here)

    This is such a nice feedback to read, thank you! Not sure if you still use Jotty or not but funnily enough I literally went live with pgp encryption today ♥️

  • Aw thank you for the kindness ♥️ There's nothing wrong in verbosity btw, I may have been a bit too harsh on my parameters, I'll tweak it a little :)

  • Regulation is absolutely needed, anyone saying otherwise is just deluded at this point 😅

  • 100% it would! I think the biggest issue around the AI hate is a total misunderstand of how it works, paired with people using it for the dumbest reasons, actually draining important resources when there's absolutely no need for it.

    I think eventually it'll be inevitably regulated as the actual shortage of water we're seeing in the US is unmanageable, and once it does get regulated things will start working way better

    p.s. i'm not talking about local models, I doubt these would ever be regulated and they SHOULDN'T, I'm talking about how many resources a company that allows AI usage should be able to utilise, mostly.

  • Hi, yeah! For sure! Indeed the world is not black and white! But even with weight, take everything with a pinch of salt <3

  • Hey! Thank you for testing it out, I think in my head, even the most verbose of dev wouldn't leave >20% of comments in their codebase. The percentage works on a ratio of (commentsCount / linesOfCode) * 100 so it doesn't just flag "a lot of comments", it mostly checks for "too many comments", that said, the "use common sense" at the top needs to be taken quite seriously, for example if there's a majority of comments but none of the comments feel like written by AI, it's clearly just the developer being verbose :)

    p.s. I find AI is pretty damn good at making docker compose files, it's probably gonna work just fine <3

  • I wanted to keep this simple, but my next step would be something that may be considered similar to a stylometric analysis, just have no idea how i'll tackle it, can't remember last time I went on stackoverflow before working on this project lol

    Something like checking patterns in length of variable names, patterns in maximum line lengths.

    My worry with it is the tool starting to flag good coding standards lol

    How would you apply stylometric analysis in a simple html/js/css project like this? As I don't want to compromise the nature of it

  • wow thank you so much for the extensive testing! Yeah it's far from perfect, but can't stress it enough, the aim of the site is not to tell you how much is made by AI but how likely it is that something was reviewed by a human!

    I'll most DEFINITELY sort out the bar situation, did not think that one through as much lol

    I did put inline styling as a AI choice, most devs wouldn't do that, AI loves doing that haha

    I'll try and fine tune things more and more, this is super helpful stuff!!

  • Thank you! ❤

  • hahaha! I had totally missed this reply 🤣 That is indeed adorable, can't say that's where the name comes from but... it also works!!

  • Sorry yeah, it's just for uploading. I tried to add a download for folders without having to zip it (i also hate having to unzip it myself) but it really makes the whole process extremely slow, I'll keep trying, it's a VERY niche thing, would definitely make this even more unique tho haha

  • Hey! I am Italian indeed :)

    Glad you like it <3 remember is a beta, keep it private for now, next release sorts out some security concerns I have and should be fairly solid from that point on!

  • Hey thanks, I was properly looking into WebDAV yesterday, should be simple enough to implement, just making sure I don't add features for the sake of it, once I'm certain it's the right way to go I'll implement it properly, for now my biggest aim is to get the tool as stable as possible ♥️

  • Thank you so much! Let me know how you get on!

  • Thank you, this is awesome! I'll have a proper investigation and decide what route to go to, I don't know enough about WebDAV and I like to make studied choices, you gave me a lot to think about and that's great!🙌

  • Hey! Yeah as long as you set the folder to the right permissions :) And I am a bit torn between WebDAV or straight websocket as it already allows file manipulation straight from the UI, so may be easier to have a socket server for collaborations

    Glad you like it ♥️