Skip Navigation

Posts
11
Comments
947
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • no shit, pick any post that mentions AI here and see who are the first ones to comment every single time.

    If you don't want a "cycle of negativity", maybe let's not throw rocks at anything for just bringing up the topic?

    how's acknowledging this herd behavior contributing to it. Some of us are also tired of reading the same crap in the comments.

  • It's not a why not response. I'm asking back why do you think it wouldn't be worth it even as a literal translation from C++, because in my view, that would be a first step towards a proper Rust port, and it still brings benefits to the table.

  • I'd give her a pass for being 15

  • Why it wouldn't be? Surely not having idiomatic rust doesn't eliminate other benefits of switching to the language, like better tooling, memory safety, and perhaps more people willing to contribute. Over time the codebase can be improved but the main goal in the transition seems to not break existing functionality, which they seem to have accomplished for LibJS.

  • out of context?

    Please coordinate with us before starting any porting work so nobody wastes their time on something we can’t merge.

    If you look at the code, you’ll notice it has a strong “translated from C++” vibe. That’s because it is translated from C++. The top priority for this first pass is compatibility with our C++ pipeline. The Rust code intentionally mimics things like the C++ register allocation patterns so that the two compilers produce identical bytecode.

    that seems reasonable to me

  • yeah, this part of the community is as insufferable as the overly enthusiastic vibe coders

  • they do, especially the billionaire ones

  • idk what to tell you, because I just tried it and it works

  • ah, this puts it together and it's exactly what I was looking for, thanks

  • ah yes, I stopped watching the guy because of that and the clickbait, but he does make some interesting content sometimes.

  • so you haven't tried it recently

  • maybe last you tried it was over 6 months ago, maybe you're using the old google assistant, or idk, but it definitely works for me

  • yeah, that's what I'm looking for. Do you know of a way to integrate ollama with HA?

    1. They can and do; 2. LLMs can do tool calling just fine, even self-hosted ones.
  • "OPERATING SYSTEM PROVIDER" MEANS A PERSON THAT DEVELOPS, LICENSES, OR CONTROLS THE OPERATING SYSTEM SOFTWARE ON A DEVICE.

    great, for my devices then, that would be me

  • yeah, I really don't get maintainers that try to put human hours to review PRs that are potentially AI generated. This equation will never balance out. There needs to be a first triaging layer that is automated, only then bring a human in the loop if it's worth continuing.

  • Keeping tokens in plaintext on the client is really common. The alternative would require the user to enter a decryption password on every system start, like some wallets do, which is a bit of a hassle. If at least there was "one obvious way of doing this" across platforms, that'd make things better, but in reality, some tools can't even put their configs and cache in a sensible location.

  • Since there was no example request/code to create a super admin account, the fact that the response told me what was missing was incredibly helpful.

    🤗

  • human-as-a-service