This is one of those, "How can I support either of these groups?" situations.
On the surface, it is NYC being tolerant to other cultures and loving to drink and party versus upstate Puritans who want a single culture and no drinking or partying. But then you read more and it is NYC being pro-slavery because it makes them money, while the Puritans were anti-slavery because it was against their God.
The fingerprint reader works well. I don't like using keypads much, but they do work well.
The smart doorbell hasn't done much yet (and hopefully won't ever be needed to do anything), but it is nice to be able to set my doorbell ring to be a fart sound. It is both funny and doesn't make my dog bark at the doorbell.
Yeah, remote HVAC is great. I also like the smart door lock that auto-unlocks as I walk up to it so I don't need to deal with keys... though that doesn't always great and I end up having to use the fingerprint reader to unlock it. It is still nice to be able to unlock the door remotely to let my neighbor bring in our packages while we're gone or to feed the dog if I'm working late.
You are surprised that a for-profit company that bills people on a RECURRING basis for a paid service keeps card numbers and billing addresses/names? How would recurring bills be paid if the info isn't stored?
I've seen other stories on Lemmy about how most Venezuelans do not like her pro-Trump stance, but this is the first link I found in a search. All other stories are a day or two old talking about how Trump is excluding her from power, so I'm having a hard time finding more. This could very well be a bullshit poll from a clearly biased source, but this might be where people are "hearing" that she is not popular.
It's not bootlicking, you weirdo. It's recognizing when one thing is right and one thing is wrong. Just because a company does something doesn't make it automatically wrong.
I know it might be a crazy concept that is hard to grasp, but the world isn't totally black and white. It's almost like bad people can do good things sometimes. And good people can do bad things sometimes. Your way of thinking is exactly the way Republicans justify all the evil shit they do. They are religious, which makes them good people, and therefore everything they do is good. In your case, you think a corporation is bad and therefore everything they do is bad.
The person who owns a trademark or copyright has a right to use that trademark and the onus to defend that trademark from other people using it. We used to allow anyone to call themselves anything they way, and it turned out badly.
Theft is when something you own is taken away. The squatter never owned the domain, only registered to use it. In this case, ICANN owns the domain and allows a registrar to handle who can use that domain. ICANN sets strict rules on how domains can be used, and the squatter broke those rules.
Maybe the judge is a little smarter on actual laws than you are.
This isn't about an intangible thing being property. This is about the way domains are controlled. Nobody owns a domain, they register the right to use a domain. All domains are controlled and "owned" by ICANN, which allows registrars to handle who can use domains.
The point isn't that intangible objects can't be property. The point is that domains are not legally owned by people or corporations. You can pay for the right to use one, but you don't own it.
How many human doctors are involved in the making of Old El Paso taco shells?
Now, conversely, how many veterinarians are involved in the designing and creation of one-size-fits-all food that is one-food-for-all-meals? Mars was already employing tons of vets to ensure their food would be both safe and have all the ingredients in a digestible form.
While I'm sure General Mills does employ human doctors to check for safety, they aren't trying to create a one-food-for-all-meals solution.
How many cars driven by humans run over cats each day? Do these outraged people think robotaxis are somehow worse than human drivers? If the humans in the car didn't see the cat, then it doesn't matter if it was a robot or a human driving at the time.
All "teams" or clubs are just franchise licenses. All players are actually employees of the league, not of the clubs themselves. The league can also dictate which clubs are allowed to sign which players. It's kind of wild.
This is one of those, "How can I support either of these groups?" situations.
On the surface, it is NYC being tolerant to other cultures and loving to drink and party versus upstate Puritans who want a single culture and no drinking or partying. But then you read more and it is NYC being pro-slavery because it makes them money, while the Puritans were anti-slavery because it was against their God.