Congratulations on responding to the first paragraph of his post. https://lemmy.world/post/44873477/23080810 (The one that made you super cross. Sure nothing from your sandbox ever makes it into production. Great. Very wise and very careful.)
No congratulations on responding to any of the rest of what I said.
Ah yes, lovely mcp. Lovely anthropic mcp. Make sure you give anthropic lots of money and use their tools and then you'll be completely safe plugging the output of the llm into the os. Definitely fine yes.
I bet you your contract with them says they're not liable for shit their llm does to your files, your environment or your repositories, mcp or no mcp.
You'll be the 4753rd guy with the oops my llm trashed my setup and disobeyed my explicit rules for keeping it in check.
You know programmers who use llms believe they're much more productive because they keep getting that dopamine hit, but when you actually measure it, they're slower by about 20%.
You appointed yourself boss over a fast and plausible intern who pastes and edits a LOT of stack overflow code, but never really understands it and absolutely is incapable of learning. You either spend almost all of your time in code review now for your stupid sycophantic llm interns who always tell you you're right but never learn from you, or you're checking in vast quantities of shit to your projects.
You know really subtle, hard to find bugs on rare cases that pass your CI every single time? Or ones that no one in their right mind would have made, but yet they compile and look right at first glance. They're now your main type of bug. You are rotting your projects with your random number generator.
And you think that all the money you're playing for your blagging llms protects you from them fucking up everything for you. But it doesn't. And you'll also find that your contract with your llm supplier expressly excludes them from any liability whatsoever arising from you using it instead pre-blaming you for trusting it.
Yeah, trying to play it cool like it doesn't matter to the USA was an extraordinarily transparent lie. Iran knows it, everyone knows it. His bullying tactics falling is what resulted in the tantrum now. Why would Iran give up one of their most effective strategies, just because the unreliable lying word-breaking thin-skinned narcissist got cross?
There's a reason other presidents didn't do it this way, Your Lowness, and it's called Vietnam. You know, the one you draft dodged?
You just have to be aware... when using a cheap model
You: just the cheap ones
I never said that.
Ohhhhhhhhh ok yes of course you never said or implied that. Not your repeated message at all. And yet you can't keep away from adressing your criticism towards free or cheap LLMs! It's like your subtext or your underlying belief is that of you just pay big tech enough money and they can just build a big enough set of server farms, it'll be ok. No, it will not be ok and the enshittification has begun from an already shitty base point.
All LLMs are shit, the cheap and free ones are indeed just easier to spot as generating shit, if you ask them about things you know about. But you have to accept that they're ALL shit and STOP making get out clauses for the expensive ones by firing your criticisms exclusively at the cheap or free ones.
Giving ANY LLM executive power over your data is A BIG MISTAKE because you're putting your data in the control of something which operates, at its heart, as a random number generator. They're trained to sound right. People trust them because they sound right. This is a fundamental error.
My mail provider isn't that big. We got blocked by both outlook and gmail, but I duckduckwent a workaround which worked. Something about editing some mail record somewhere. Can't remember what, I'm afraid.
Wow. I think if I lived in that sort of climate I might not be driving an electric car. But I also think the likelihood of me moving to a climate that hostile is low. Keep safe out there!
Ah yes good old tens of thousands in debt and property costing ten times what it used to when boomers bought them, cost of living souring, wages not climbing, and of course it's the cheap tasty chicken keeping the young folk from owning their own home. Yeeeesss. Great financial logic there, (checks notes) Wall Street Journal.
He's not wrong.