Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)L

Log in | Sign up

@ davidagain @lemmy.world

Posts
5
Comments
981
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Between the ages of about 13 and 17, teenagers are very sensitive to peer pressure and are also trying hard to be more mature, so they police each other's and their own interests against being 'childish'.

    Once they're old enough that they don't worry about looking like kids, if their peer group is chill and non judgemental (for example, in quite a lot of colleges and universities), they relax and enjoy some toys again.

    It's common to reject the previous stage in maturity temporarily. So middle schoolers don't want to be mislabelled as primary school children and high schoolers don't want to be mislabelled as middle schoolers, just as college attendees don't want to be mislabelled as school children at all etc. With enough distance, "NO!" becomes "lol, no" and people relax.

    I can't stress the importance of having a chill and non judgemental peer group for this process to work enough, though.

    In a house with children, playing with the kids is always being a great parent, but can also be neglecting sharing the burden of work, and there's a lot of work, so play activities can also be seen as negative. Maybe that's why some of the parents aren't into fun. Often parents try to be sensible and responsible while grandparents unashamedly have fun.

    TL;DR: It's a sign of further maturity to stop policing maturity.

  • Thank you. I didn't know what 23 was about

  • Nope. Source: am gen X.

  • Ain't no-one more politically exposed than one Donald J Trump.So, probably, and as far as we know,Ain't no-one more redacted in the Epstein Files than that Donald J Trump.

    I'd put the word president in front of his surname, but he's not worthy of the honour, and he's not worthy of the presidency.

    I didn't think there was anyone in the world who could make George W Bush look statesmanlike, well-informed, wise, responsible and honest. I was wrong.

  • If you had a single H2O molecule you wouldn't notice it and wouldn't call it water, so all water is touching other water, therefore all water is wet. QED.

  • More daughterfucker than motherfucker in his dreams and on Epstein's plane, if you go by how he talks.

  • Remember that for Republicans: Every accusation is a confession.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Monsanto paid a bunch of scientists to "discover" that Glyphosate, the patented active ingredient in their RoundUp weedkiller is safe for humans, but the article was ghost-written by Monsanto employees without acknowledgement. The article claimed that Glyphosate does not cause cancer, but The World Health Organisation found that it does. Some people have trouble figuring out who is lying between the company making vast profits and the organisation tasked with keeping people healthy across the globe. RoundUp is used a LOT on genetically modified foods made by guess who to be "RoundUp ready" - resistant to RoundUp. These genetically modified foods were also found to be safe initially, but guess who funded that research who are only now, 25 years later, found to be ghost writing the articles instead of letting the scientists do their own work and draw their own conclusions.

  • Do you mean Idiocracy?

  • So much this.

  • You'd go trans for me? Sweet.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Can't tell you how excited I am to read this headline, despite the feeling that I really oughtn't count my chickens before they've hatched.

  • I think I'm falling in love with you. Is that gay?

  • You're right and I should stop being so rude to you. You're so wise. I respect you as the source of this viewpoint so very much because you live it out in such an exemplary fashion.

  • try another round of edits

    The edits are because I mistype stuff or realise that it doesn't say what I intended when I read through it, or I left something out. Today suggests to me that you might benefit from trying that occasionally. It clearly doesn't suggest it to you, I see.

    The day I start to care how many internet points I’m getting

    Dude, the points are evidence that your comment came across badly, no more. Something you could learn from, but it's increasingly clear you would do or say anything rather than back down. I'm guessing you see apology as weak and admitting your mistakes as defeat or some other fucked up macho fake alpha fragile masculinity bullshit like that.

    before I do work up some “hatred” to turn on someone

    Oh no! I'm so scared!

    Wait, you still think you were being nice or polite or something already? Wow.

    you kinda suck

    Whereas you're all sweetness and light. Gotcha.

    Need to quit engaging with you

    Feel free. I shan't miss you a great deal.

    You could go back to interacting with those friends you were telling me about. Presumably ones that don't mind you saying you'll sabotage their income stream because they didn't live up to your principles.

  • Well I'm petty sure you were coming across as obnoxious and the vote count seems to agree.

    If most people are interpreting the things you said earlier in the thread negatively, maybe the cause is in the writer than the reader.

    Maybe have another look and see if you mightn't have written a bit of a sourpost originally, and reconsider your tone next time if you genuinely mean no harm.

    Some of us need to earn a living from coding, and I don't like the idea that you would rather destroy the earning potential of a one-person team than compromise your politics at all even a little bit.

    Turn your hatred on the exploitative multinational corporations, not the little guy trying to earn a living from his code.

    There's principles, and there's actual people, and the people are far, far more important. Don't be so quick to condemn the little guy for wanting a bit of cash while Besos and the like screw us both over on the daily with billions in their pockets.

    People aren't corporations, and confusing those is partly how America got so extreme in its capitalism.

  • Sounded to me like you were firing off at someone for having a private personal project by claiming that you would personally intervene to prevent them making any money from their code, then later you told them that they were being self aggrandizing. That's how it comes across.

    You doubled down on your threat with detail, which doesn't give readers the context to be able to deduce that you meant to be in the slightest bit self aware or apologetic, so without re-quoting yourself, it came across as hypocritical.

    Maybe "sorry, that was somewhat facetious and self-aggrandizing of me" and then not doubling down might have come across better. That's what I think, anyway.

  • Forge jerk-off? No. Not that. Definitely not that.