Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
3
Comments
915
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Glad you ask. The core of the moral framework are humans. Life should be good for humans. Why humans? Because I'm a human. And my moral framework should be universal, applicable by any other human on earth, because offering a morality that work good for every human is the only way to ensure that everyone can follow it and then have a good society. It doesn't apply to animals as animals themselves cannot adhere at any moral framework they don't have the ability to do so.

    That being said the moral dogma look to ensure the behaviours that should ensure that human life is good. Slavery is bad for a human, so it's a bad thing. It's quite simple. A human suffering is just plain bad.

    Why I mentioned cruelty before. Because in my moral framework animals have no rights, they couldn't they are not passive subjects of my morals. But the relationship between humans and animals (and plants and other elements is not inconsecuential in human-human relationships). Humans who are cruel inevitably cause pain in other humans, thus why cruelty is to be avoided. Including cruelty towards animals, planta or other elements. Humans have the right to live in a cruelty free world. That's why being cruel towards an animal, like causing the animal pain for no other reason that causing it pain, is bad, is cruel and creates a bad world for humans (in essence I'm not caring about the animal here, just about what world is being created for the humans). But if an animal gets killed just because it's a source of food, and cruelty had no part in the equation, then it's not bad, as that behavior doesn't create a bad world for humans to live in.

  • Fruitarian diet is quite dangerous.

    It's already hard eating all necessary nutrients on a vegan diet. Possible, but harder than with omnivore diet.

    But restricting to just fruits... I don't know if it's even possible to get all your body needs just from fruits.

  • Yeah.

    They would need to specify to which set of ethics are they talking about. And then we could compare to which ethics a vegan diet adhere more or less.

  • Are you reducing the harm to others in a actually statically significant quantity though?

    To others I suppose you refer to animals. By being vegan you mosly reduce harm to a few species of big animals.

    Most animals by quantity are insects.

    If you count by individuals a person who saves a few ant nest from the horrors of nature and give them a nice controlled habitat would reduce the number of harm happening to individual animals orders of magnitude over what a diet change could achieve.

    As for environmental damage. It's a way. But not the only way. The most effective way to control environmental control would be to reduce the number of humans on earth.

  • No, I have a developed system of morality, quite strong. And eating meat doesn't contradict it.

    For anyone curious the model is based on avoidance of cruelty. Cruelty is what makes people bad. If you do something with cruel intentions it doesn't matter what you destroy, a human, other animal, a plant or even a geological formation. If you do it with cruelty on mind you are a bad person.

    But if your intentions are others, then there's nothing bad. You eat meat not because you want to be cruel towards an animal, but because you want to eat. Then it's ok.

    It's all about avoiding cruel intentions on humans. Those are my morals at least. I follow them and judge anothers based on them.

  • I wonder what the motivation is. Surely is not to do something good.

    Tax deductions by donating money to a non-profit?

    A try to get a grasp on one programming language with a bright future so they could profit out of it later?

    A PR move?

    An attempt to get on the good side of Mozilla so they get partnership for AI integration in Firefox?

  • I didn't even remember it had AI. I think I think I disabled it as soon as it popped out and they never bothered me about it again.

  • I switched for IE to firefox on 2007 and never switch back.

    There are some things here and there(mostly due things being implemented by default for chromium), but it has always been the best browser overall for me.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • I want one random atom to be one plank unit shifted to the left at the beginning of the universe.

    🦋

  • Quantum computer booleans. True/False/Everything in between.

  • I have many services that doesn't "need" to be public, as public facing for one specific reason. TLS.

    A lot of the times android apps won't connect to http directions, not even local ones, and require a proper https connection with a well known CA.

    For that I put the services behind a caddy reverse proxy to get a valid tls certificate.

    And them I do the trick, and basically on caddy reject any connection that's not local. Thus, making the supposedly "public" site a practical "local" one.

    Once there I just connect through wireguard.

  • I have that but with caddy.

    On the caddyfile you can put to only serve the site to certain IPs and reject the others with any status normally 403 or 404.

    Attackers probe the site, but all they get it's a connection error.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Last time I was stung by a wasp I was just standing on the street. I wasn't even moving. I was standing for about 30 minutes waiting when suddenly a wasp came, stung me on the neck and went away flying.

    It was a "fuck you in particular" with qll the letters.

  • When they have good names they get stolen.

    Try took up about gemini protocol.

  • Yeah. Layoffs started with svb bankruptcy. They run out of free investor money and now they are extremely pressured to cut expenses. AI is just the lamest excuse for investors

  • It's great for solo roleplaying.

    I mean. Not great. But it's something you can interact with in a way that's not possible without other people. So that's something.

  • It's a fair point.

    I've had diverse success using llm for coding.

    For simple things and basic questions it has worked. For anything complex. It has been a complete failure.

    But I've never used a paid tool, most of the time I just use self hosted LLMs. But, to be honest, I don't think the paid tools are that much better.

    But if someone knows how to use it better. And assumes responsibility for checking the code, I'm ok with it.

    It's just a tool like many others, it can be usedfor good or for bad.

  • I think Pixelfed can sit nicely behind a reverse proxy, to reduce exposure.

    I don't know if there are prebuilt scenarios for pixelfed in crowdsec or fail2ban but it shouldn't be so hard to at least write something to prevent bruteforce.