Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
3
Comments
945
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • It also has a Firefox extension that add download and subscribe buttons for Tubearchivist directly on youtube website.

  • Ok tidy up this place. We have visitors coming soon.

  • When half the posts in your feed are "X instance bad" people get just tired and go out.

    It has happened to me sometimes a meaningful part of my feed was just people brigading about some instance they don't like. It's ridiculous.

  • There's zero relationship between data being unencrypted and it being sent to chinese servers.

    If you use a chinese service it's obvious that data is going to be sent to a chinese server and that the chinese server would be able to read it.

    Unencrypted data transfer, it's a totally different thing. I would like to see if it's truly unencrypted or just not using apple proprietary encryption.

    I luckily don't own any apple product, but I have deepseek app on my android device. If I'm bored later I'll try to intercept my own data to see if it's truly unencrypted. This is easy to test. If it's not true that newspaper is going to my "block list" asap.

  • And redbull give you wings.

    Marketing within a capitalist market be like that for every product.

  • If you are sitting just slap your legs while saying "Well..." and doing a noise like you were a 107 yo who just got up for first time in 13 years.

  • I have thought a lot on it. The LLM per se would not know if the question is answerable or not, as it doesn't know if their output is good of bad.

    So there's various approach to this issue:

    1. The classic approach, and the one used for censoring: keywords. When the llm gets a certain key word or it can get certain keyword by digesting a text input then give back a hard coded answer. Problem is that while censoring issues are limited. Hard to answer questions are unlimited, hard to hard code all.

    2. Self check answers. For everything question the llm could process it 10 times with different seeds. Then analyze the results and see if they are equivalent. If they are not then just answer that it's unsure about the answer. Problem: multiplication of resource usage. For some questions like the one in the post, it's possible than the multiple randomized answers give equivalent results, so it would still have a decent failure rate.
  • He is definitely in the same list as Trump and Elon Musk.

  • They are not random per se. They are just statistical with just some degree of randomization.

  • That happens when do you not understand what is a llm, or what its usecases are.

    This is like not being impressed by a calculator because it cannot give a word synonym.

  • I'll wait for the Julian Assange review.

  • "Don't be evil"

    What about we be evil anyway?

  • I don't listen to anything in any of those scenarios.

    Many people are not listening music 24/7.

    Music is nice, I don't say it's not. But you could 100% live without it.

  • Yeah, that has like 0 chances for working. At most it would annoy bots for web search, at least it has a proper robots.txt.

    But any agent trying to process data for AI is not going to go to random websites. It's going to use a curated list of sites with valuable content.

    At this point text generation datasets can be achieved with open data, and data sold by companies like reddit or Microsoft, they don't need to "pirate" your blog posts.

  • I'm tech savvy and I use AI daily.

    Probably not the AI you think of. As it's not LLM or image generation.

    But I have a security system self hosted using frigate, which uses AI models for image recognition.

  • We could ask for anonymous digital certificates. It works this way.

    Many countries already emit digital certificates for it's citizens. Only one certificate by id. Then anonymous certificates could be made. The anonymous certificate contains enough information to be verificable as valid but not enough to identify the user. Websites could ask for an anonymous certificate for register/login. With the certificate they would validate that it's an human being while keeping that human being anonymous. The only leaked data would probably be the country of origin as these certificates tend to be authentificated by a national AC.

    The only problem I see in this is international adoption outside fully developed countries: many countries not being able to provide this for their citizens, having lower security standards so fraudulent certificates could be made, or a big enough poor population that would gladly sell their certificate for bot farms.

  • There is this bug in TIC-80.

    When running the wasm version on firefox it has very bad framerate.

    So as many before me I pulled my sleeved and opened the firefox profiler to see what's going on. Well, the framerate has never been better. As soon as you turn off the profiler the framerate drops.

    I thought I was going insane, until I saw that other people luckily found the same behavior. For now, the unofficial fix is opening the firefox profiler when playing on firefox.

  • *cel

    Jump
  • I'd argue against giving false hopes.

    Learning to love yourself is good. But people should be aware that there's a good chance they'll never find love in their whole lives. That's a reality some people need to prepare to.

    It's not the end of the world. No one wants to live without love but it happens even to the best of people. The best someone can do is just learning how to live by themselves and enjoy that kind of life.

    If love eventually comes, good luck, but it's not a guarantee. And if someone has been single for a long time (I mean the better part of their adult life) chances are they will just be single for life, or at least without proper love. And people need to be prepare for that, because it's not easy.