Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)D
Posts
3
Comments
945
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • Different things.

    The singularity of a black hole is located in space.

    The initial singularity of the big bag happened "everywhere" the whole universe was supposed to have infinite density.

    The mass of the black hole is finite. It's very dense but it have a quantifiable amount of mass.

    For the big bang the mass was also infinite as far as we know. Everything was singularity, every "energy" in your body was part of that infinitely large singularity. Not only everything but everywhere. Where you sit there was singularity during the big bang. As far as we know every single point in space was part of the initial singularity. We don't come from a single point that exploded towards empty space. Expansion is more like the surface of a balloon. Maybe it's better to think of it as stretching rather than expanding.

    Beyond that we don't know much about both, there are barriers which prevent direct observation of both.

    The expansion of the universe is a completely different matter, as it's not only expanding, it's expanding faster that out gravitational models predict, like the universe is not only "ignoring" black holes, it's expanding despite all observable matter, and all untraceable matter (dark matter), and it's expanding faster and faster driven by an unknown phenomenon we call "dark energy" for giving it a name, because we have remotely not idea of what's going on.

  • They are like stars in the sense of orbital mechanics.

    But a star can be completely understood by the laws of physics we know. While a black hole breaks our understanding and we have no idea what's going on in there.

    It's the fear of the unknown.

  • The original comment were referring to the ring singularity which is different from the accretion disk.

    The singularity is unseen, we suppose it's a ring in rotating back holes, but we have no idea. As anything inside the event horizon, we cannot see what's going on in there.

    The accretion disk is the disk of matter falling into the black hole, it's outside the event horizon and can be observed.

  • Until what age do you pretend to live?

  • People are against it because several reasons.

    First because it's a very specific taste/opinion that they don't share. You are saying that "all would be more appealing without softcore porn", but it seems that you are the only one who thinks that here, most people don't care or even like it. We could also put a filter to blurry dog pictures for people scare of dogs, where does it end? Until which point personal tastes should have their own explicit filters? It ends in a "word filter" which is already usable.

    Also I would say that most people is against this because it reads as a first step towards a "porn ban". We have no puritan advertisements or pay processor to please. People here like the freedom. And that would be a step in the opposite direction. It reads a little like so many discourses we are seeing in so many places to make them "family friendly" and to "protect the children". I would suppose that due the nature of the fediverse (which is a push back against those people controlling our internet) is against anything that looks like that.

  • I don't know any place which have the proposed "soft nsfw" filter separate from "nsfw".

    Comparison with reddit is weird as reddit r/all is full of ""artistic"" pictures or paintings of naked women.

    Also the fediverse is not really like reddit. The more the platform grows the more useless All becomes. Try to go to mastodon and browse by "all" it's unusable. Either pick an instance with a good "local" you like or all is not really that important. I don't think it's a "first impressions", first impression is "local". All is never going to be a curated feed, not a consistent one. It's a federated platform, which means a LOT of diversity and variety on communities and posts.

    Also I don't see or even want to start consider anything that shows a little skin "nsfw". I think that's a very personal taste that should not be universally applied.

    I really don't buy the argument here.

  • It's going to be catgirls and catboys. We all know it.

  • Ask Norman Reedus. Everyone and their sister in UK is Norman Reedus now.

  • Remember remember the 5th of November.

  • Do you have time to talk about our lord Rust? Did you know it died for our bugs so we don't have to debug them at run time?

  • Every atom of the universe should have its own ip.

  • It's always funny how the state is powerful enough to enforce a mass surveillance and control system on anyone who wants to use internet. But when it comes to tax the rich "it cannot be done, it's too difficult".

    And yes, I'm looking at you """""""labour""""""" party.

  • Not really. Good coffee shops and pubs are always full. So most of the time we just settle for the place which have free seats that day.

  • When the ad is about this topic that you just talk out. loud with a friend 5 minutes ago.

  • You made me remember about this couple I know. He was going on down there, apparently good enough for her to suddenly close her legs hard enough catching his ear piercing in a bad way and ripping it out. Granting an ER visit.

  • Then we have me, who forgot to eat today and I was wondering why I felt dizzy.

  • Tor is not that slow for normal internet usage. You can even watch videos in SD.

  • Last line really needs a citation.

    Where I live they are plague. If you have them in your garden they will eat absolutely everything.

    I love snails, and I have had them as pets sometimes. They are cute and fun. But most common species found in cities are not endangered afaik, quite the opposite.

  • Last reply, after blocking your because your insult.

    Population control do not require any violent measure.

    It can be as simple as making people lives better, as it has been proven that populations with higher life quality have less children. Then achieving the objective of having a lesser global population .

    Discussion ends here as you have been blocked.