Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
3
Comments
332
Joined
2 yr. ago

  • If you read this law bill in the strictest way, it makes almost no sense. It says that anyone who makes or controls an operating system has to check the age of every person who uses it. But it does not limit this to big companies. That could mean volunteers who help build Debian or even someone at home making their own version of Linux. The law bill would expect them to build a system that asks for (and verifies) a birthday before you can use the computer.

    It gets even stranger with websites like GitHub. If someone downloads shared code and uses it, the person who posted it might be seen as responsible. But they have no way to know who downloaded it or what they did with it. The law bill would still expect their system to check ages and share that information with app makers.

  • They are in a never ending bathtub tho.

  • Options: More conservative or lower IQ

    Implication: Option #2

    Secondary analysis: Good person

    Interaction behavior: Amicable, but simple

  • Not to veer off topic, but I always found this timeline fascinating: First straight line no frills flight was 1903. The first dogfight (with pistols) was 1913. The first [officially recognized] dogfight with machine guns was 1914. By 1915, forward-firing machine guns became standard, allowing for aggressive aerial duels.

    If only science and discovery was our species’ true priority :(

  • Makes sense as a Russian operative

  • This is the answer.

    Most docs can’t keep up with the mountain of paperwork or billing codes required by insurance companies these days. The software helps, but requires the doc to review and sign off the notes.

    It’s not an LLM coming up with treatment plans, etc. It’s transcription+

  • “Please sign in.”

  • Well, I guess it’s technically installed software… but the scope is significantly less than what’s implied from the headline. My immediate reaction was, “how?”

    This is basically standard browser fingerprinting, hence why it’s sold for surveillance activities. Linked in is big brother.

  • Yeah, I had the same thought. The order does say “from” any individual rather than “to” (i.e. when ballots are sent from voting office and addressed to the voter).

    Though cynical me doubts this distinction will matter when it comes to delaying/withholding ballots in either direction.

  • This isn’t even malicious compliance. It’s just compliance. The owner of the system can set ages for system users. Smart people will set it to what they want.

  • The only way this can be implemented at the OS level (not the vendor level) is to put in whatever date you want. That includes any notion of scanning “IDs”.

    If you want to setup a kid’s account on a phone or pc, then you have the control. If they are smart enough to do it themselves, then hey- don’t hold them back.

    My immediate concern is giving sites additional fingerprinting material. The OS better not give away an actual birthdate- when they can option for adult/not-adult, etc. Next concern is moving the age verification to a corporation, at which point the dystopia is real.

  • Or, you know, fix the voting system.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Speaking of which. Imperialism.

  • Easy, just create a long heat sink and dangle it in the earth’s atmosphere. Now we are winning!

  • The cookies rejection process was literally five pages, and then it never went away. Screw that company.

  • I’d be okay with the use of DUNKED, one time.

  • I’ve made up my mind I’m never clicking a headline that includes the word slam.

    Edit: okay maybe if it includes the word “body” first, and especially if it says “fascist” after