I’m not convinced by that whole theory that “if everyone voted, the elections would turn out different!”.
There's a strong correlation between election turnout and results trending conservative or progressive. It's not the numbers but the percentage of turnout -- and when turnout percentage is higher, the results skew progressive.
I'm a senior xyz in one job and "the guy who's been here 24 years" in the side gig. Half my job is asking "is that the best way to do that when it's gonna also do this?" if I know it's sub-optimal.
Tech companies hoping to keep certifications that allow them to get customers do not "move fast and break things". This kind of ghetto process should definitely hurt business.
For instance: at my day job where I tech-whore to big ents and govs, about 10% of our time is spent only in meetings where we review what's happening and how: and that kind of transfer would have a schedule, stakeholder sign-off and listed processes to follow and review. There's post-incident reviews and follow-ups in case of the slightest deviation or surprise, and the process is refined each time. That kind of sloppy work wouldn't survive.
However, only one side prioritizes loyalty over even the people where the other side encourages introspection and talk about what impacts that loyalty.
the people with the most options are often the first to leave. The employees who remain may not be the most committed — they may simply be the least mobile.
This has been called the Dead Sea Effect.
What remains, in all cases, is usually very salty.
Nah. We stopped buying American, and instead we buy Canada and Scotland and New Zealand alcohol products. It's not a reduction, just a delicious shift.
There's a strong correlation between election turnout and results trending conservative or progressive. It's not the numbers but the percentage of turnout -- and when turnout percentage is higher, the results skew progressive.