i am more than willing to engage on any positive claim you want to make (i probably agree with a lot of them). what i’m not willing to do is tolerate personal attacks and dogpiling.
there are three categories: moral duty, amoral, and immoral. if we can't agree on that, you are not qualified to discuss morality.
there is no ethical duty to be vegan. so not being vegan is a valid choice. the choice to be vegan is amoral.
I thought you were saying an ethical argument could be made for both being vegan and not being veganright. that's not the same as saying one is more ethical.
your explanation for how being non-vegan can be more ethical than being veganboy, that's not what i said.
any topic, so long as I don't need to commit to a positive claim. if someone else is willing to construct an argument, I can attack the premises.
I like black wallpaper. I like to keep the serial number of the machine visible. the wallpaper is black with the serial number. my phone lock screen includes my imeis, mac address, bluetooth mac, model, and serial noI'm just quirky like that
consent must be informed. since cattle cannot be informed, they are identical to locks in matters of consent.
it's is absurd to discuss consent from a cow. do you ask locks for consent before you force your keys in them?
there are three categories: moral duty, amoral, and immoral. if we can't agree on that, you are not qualified to discuss morality.