Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
569
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Because if so, then it seems like even the slightest bit of critical thinking ability would easily steer men clear of it.

    Absolutely correct, in my view. "Fear of judgment and a low sense of self worth" is also spot on.

    Rogan gave national voice to plenty of people who regularly used the term "snowflake" to describe what they saw as weak people who like to complain (I'm speaking from memory here and generalizing; Rogan probably has also used this term himself, but I'm not searching transcripts, so take all this with a grain of salt). By this logic, a "snowflake" is someone who is perceived as weak because they let so much affect them emotionally.

    But these toxic men are "snowflakes" in every sense of the term. They go on Joe Rogan to complain about trans people, or gay rights, or "the war on Christmas", or the perceived persecution of "alpha males", or any number of other issues. Some guests are only famous because they complain about such things.

    So what is the difference between a toxic "alpha male" on Joe Rogan and one of the "snowflakes" they like to complain about? Absolutely nothing, except that the toxic men believe that anger doesn't count as an emotion, so their insecurity allows them to show it regularly.

    (And to be clear, there is nothing wrong with showing emotion or caring deeply about something -- that's not a point I'm trying to make)

  • These products exist to collect data to train models. Every other function they perform is secondary.

    People are paying hundreds for these, and then they're paying the companies with their data, over and over again. Never before has an industry been able to have such spin on a product.

    It's effectively paying a company for the ability to give them unpaid labor.

  • So is it fair to say (in your view) that the case is more about AI personhood than copyright itself?

    Headline definitely seems misleading. Even some parts of the body of the article try and push it the other way.

  • MAGA will never turn on Trump.

    They spent years harping on a "deep state cabal" that was trafficking children. When the world learned that the reality was actually much worse, but Daddy Trump was implicated, all of a sudden it was fake news.

    If that didn't do it, nothing will. They won't turn on Trump because MAGA is a cult of personality. It's not about facts and it's not even about principles. It's about each of them keeping Donald Trump's tiny penis in their mouth at all times.

  • Rogan is a great example of a few things:

    • The Dunning-Kruger effect
    • "I'm just asking questions" being used as an excuse to host an unbalanced number of individuals purporting one specific worldview
    • Toxic masculinity posing as intellectualism

    He is extremely popular with one particular demographic. That demographic tends to share the toxic masculinity and the Dunning-Kruger-fueled belief that they can be experts at everything from the armchair.

  • Microsoft will have plenty more missteps as they continue to fall from relevance.

  • So which executives are going to jail?

    None?

  • They like freaking out over social issues that don't affect them, like the men currently on an anti-trans crusade.

    They don't like freaking out over actual problems we could fix in theory, like health care or income disparity. For those, they obstruct to stay relevant.

  • When will these idiots learn that the way to lower fraud and crime is to stop lowering everything else?

    Want to reduce medical fraud? Make it cheaper.

    Want to reduce property crime? Bring more people out of poverty.

    Taking more shit away incentivizes more fraud.

  • 2026: "My LLM is female and conscious."

    2016: "My body pillow is female and prefers to be called Waifuchan"

  • I looked around me and saw blocks, floating in the sky. A turtle was at my feet, staring blankly as it approached without hesitation. Mushrooms were walking around like people; I had to jump over them or I knew I would come to harm. I found I could flatten them if I landed on top in the right spot. I knew there was a princess I was trying to save, but she was in another castle.

    Pay up, Nintendo!

  • Yes, that is the truth. "Flood the Zone" was also a favorite of Goebbels.

  • Wow, sounds like someone in the administration a) learned to read, and b) read the First Amendment of the Constitution??!

    Feels like Jurassic Park when the raptors learn to open doors.

  • These kinds of projects are basically always impressive, in particular on machines which predate the concept of protected memory. It is especially impressive on this machine.

    For anyone who may not be familiar with the TI-99/4A, it is a strange beast. It competed with 8-bit micros like those from Commodore and Apple. On paper, the TI-99/4A looked more impressive because it has a 16-bit CPU, but the machine is effectively limited to 8 bits anyway due to supporting hardware and logic elsewhere. The weird design backfired, because it's ultimately a very slow machine and obviously less performant than those 8-bit machines against which it was meant to compete.

  • Newsom effectively wants the Dems to be less progressive. From my perspective, the Dems continue to lose because they continue to shaft their progressive constituents, of which there are many.

    Things have shifted so far to the right in the US that mainline Dems would be considered conservative in many other countries of the world. The US does not have a left party, progressive or otherwise. If you accept this, then it's easy to suggest Newsom is just one other centrist masquerading as a leftist. His claims here support that view.

    There are many, many other reasons not to like Newsom, but ultimately he is a symptom of a much deeper problem.

  • Pay your taxes or shut up.

  • I don't think "fuck directly with people's shit because you were handed an L" is a winning political strategy. Will it cost him? Hell no! We've never had a cult leader as president before.

  • There's already a lot of MAGA people convinced that "activist judges" are acting against Trump just to act against Trump... You know, as opposed to ruling against him because he's breaking the law.

    Nevermind all those other SCOTUS rulings handing the executive branch more power. Those don't matter. Clearly now it's stacked with activist judges.

    I wonder if anyone from MAGA could actually define what "checks and balances" or "separation of powers" means.

  • Is it in mostly ALL CAPS and does it read like it was written by some kind of deranged ten year old who just discovered ChatGPT?

    Those are written by the President of the United States. That's the timeline we're in.

    THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!

  • Absoutely. It takes like 5 seconds to get a real photo.

    But I have considerable downvotes on my original comment. Maybe bots. Maybe AI bros who need to see the light and that their tech is based on the death of IP law.