Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)C
Posts
40
Comments
712
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Trump, who frequently touts his rally crowd sizes and has claimed without evidence that Harris uses artificial intelligence to boost her crowd numbers, was also in Texas on Friday. He reportedly spoke to a far more modest crowd of around 100 supporters in Austin before recording a podcast interview with Joe Rogan.

  • Alternate (More accurate) Headline:Washington Post editorial writers’ endorsement of Kamala Harris stopped by CEO

    “The Washington Post will not be making an endorsement of a presidential candidate in this election,” wrote Will Lewis, The Post’s chief executive. “Nor in any future presidential election. We are returning to our roots of not endorsing presidential candidates.”

    The Washington Post’s editorial writers had already drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris for president, according to four people who spoke on condition of anonymity to discuss sensitive newsroom matters.

  • Shallow playbook.

    You go to war with the army you have…

  • I just hope he doesn’t manage to run out the clock before facing consequences.

    I wouldn’t bet on it, but I do hope for it.

  • Lincoln Project founder Rick Wilson: “Kamala came to Fox to stack bodies.”

    😂

    …and on a more serious note:

    Former New York Congressman Max Rose called it “a home run, because she sent the one message that needs to be sent, which was, ‘I will go anywhere at any time and show the courage necessary to speak to every American,’ because that’s what a real president does. The primary critique against her prior to this point was that she was not doing enough interviews. No one thought that the Fox News interview was going to go swimmingly every step of the way. Everyone knew it would be adversarial, but she showed exactly what she needed to show, which was that she is a leader, ready to be president on Day One.”

  • I could only find MSN aggregation of third rate sources (Times Now, The Spun, and Daily Beast).

    Do you have a link?

  • No shit. I did find some reports confirming that, but none I trust enough to share.

  • These people have put political signs everywhere around here that say “Vote Cupcakes” or “Vote Cookies for president”

    They think it’s all a joke

  • That's the one group I don't understand, the finance guys, business owners, stock analysts, etc. How can they possibly be on team Trump?

    Tax cuts for the rich

  • I could do it, but not since the stairs are out of TP

  • 1% Subscribed98% Local/New1% All

  • I am looking at the numbers. Your graphic says the same thing the article does. That’s why I was asking for clarification

  • How does this address the swing with a single datapoint?

  • I mean It’s just Cheerios in tomato juice¯(ツ)_/¯

  • My point is people are likely choosing the Raw article because of the baity title. Their goals are not your goals.

  • Pretty sure this is intentional due to the community’s rule about maintaining the article’s title and only altering for clairity

  • It’s funny how we’ve heard the GOP whine about ‘activist judges’ for decades and it turned out it was just projection all along…