I'm also on Mastodon as https://hachyderm.io/@BoydStephenSmithJr .
It wouldn't surprise me if Miller was one of those "Skinny guys [that] fight 'til they're burger."
I thought he might have been the source of Elmu's black eye for a while.
I disagree that an IQ restriction would be an improvement. It would just be another tool used by authority to marginalize. Competency tests have been used as such in both the U.S. South and Nazi Germany.
Improving the electorate and having the output of the voting process reflect their will is the only way forward.
Honestly, I don't like either programmability approach (vimscript/lua OR emacs-lisp), but I'll probably just stick with neovim, because when I'm on a system without my configuration, I've more productive there, and I don't want to learn enough emacs-lisp "APIs" to reproduce my somewhat small vim configuration.
IQ is a poor metric (for just about anything).
We do need to work on election reform so that our elected representatives are more representative. Getting more people to vote (turn out in the U.S. is fairly low), avoiding partizan gerrymandering, using something other than FPtP.
the Government of the United States of America is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion
-- Treaty of Tripoli, 1797
- JumpDeleted
Permanently Deleted
I have a prior source to refute that: https://www.arjen.eu/2011/09/how-to-prepare-a-kiwi/ /s
I've done some body-weight stuff (sit-ups, push-ups, squats), but I can't really get a good aerobic exercise inside the house.
I have a pretty good grasp on what I'm cooking anyway. I have my own spreadsheet where I extracted the Nutritional Information label (or looked up bulk foods on fat secret website), to plan to keep my calories until 14000/wk and keep my sodium down. For me, it was easiest to go vegan: beans, quinoa, greens, nooch, plant milk. I have been eating out more, and that's no on there, nor do they publish nutritional information (local family chain). But, I also get the "vegetarian" faire there (there's a white sauce so I'm pretty sure there's dairy in it) but I know I can skip a couple of my meals to roughly balance that, caloricly at least. That got me down the first hundred. I still need to lose more, but it's harder now; I used to be closer to a gym... among other things.
Nobel prize-winning anti-parasitic for humans, yes.
Several studies show no statistically significant effect on COVID-19 length or severity.
You can do single-blind. You do prep, anesthetize, then open the card that decides if the surgery continues, or if the patient is simply awakened at the expected time.
You can also do it for surgeries that use locals, but then the surgical staff has to do a lot of miming/acting instead of actual cutting.
Medlife Crisis did a couple of Placebo effect videos, and mentioned that he participated in a single-blind stent study.
I don't know how you'd do double-blind.
I'm absolutely sure I experience "lonely mouth", but that's what I mentally refer to a "desire to eat" vs. "hunger". My desire to eat is nearly unlimited. I'll literally be leaving a restaurant and start thinking about the next flavor palette to send to my tongue.
No, the hunger I'm currently having problems with is coming from my guts, a tightness or emptiness usually just below the sternum (or as low as my innie), sometimes but not always accompanied by noise that while generally internal-only is sometime externally audible.
I can ignore it. I often initially choose to quiet it through consuming water or other zero-calorie fluids, but when it doesn't go away within a few minutes of fluid consumption, that approach isn't going to work. I can just ignore/suffer it; I have done 72-hour fasting before, but I found it neither enjoyable nor very productive (didn't seem to affect weight loss rate overall). After a while it does fail to distract me as much, but then comes back at irregular intervals.
I know there's probably a happy medium out there. And, it's even possible I don't need to lose quite as much weight as I think. But, I'd really like to have visible abs -- I can do 100 body-weight sit-ups, or 190lb. sitting abdominal crunches, but I still have a fat cap that hides whatever muscles are there.
I used to snack on dried pineapple or cashews, but I found I was still getting hungry frequently, sometimes within an hour of snacking. I've also tried to yogurt and granola snacks, to similar results.
If I don't just "be hungry", I overeat.
My "best" snack so far is popcorn, because the kcal/volume is so low, so it takes me longer to eat.
Well, I'm down 100 lbs from where I started. But, between work and caregiver duties, I can usually only get to the gym 3 days a week, and sometimes less.
I buy quinoa and beans in bulk, so there's not exactly a barcode to scan for those either. I actually need to avoid pre-packaged food even more than I do currently. The low-calorie ones tend to be high sodium, and a lot of just too many calories.
My weight also fluctuates more than I'd expect. I take it on the same scale, and the same part of my morning (nearly first thing in the morning, just after I brush my teeth) and I'll routinely lose more than a pound (or after a bad day, gain more than 10), tho experts really say losing more than about a pound a week is unsustainable.
I don't feel fat ... but my BMI is obese. And, I feel like I'm "always" hungry. The only thing keeping me at this weight is that I keep up my exercise and just suffer through hunger sometimes. :(
There's no way I can afford Wegovy, and I'm sure I'd be one of the people that get blinded by it even if I could afford.
- In https://lemm.ee/comment/20947041 they claimed "implicit type coercion" and showed many examples; they did NOT claim "string concatenation".
- However, that was in reply to https://lemmy.world/comment/17473361 which was talking about "implicit conversion to string" which is a specific type of "implicit type coercion"; NONE of the examples given involved a conversion to string.
- But also, that was in reply to https://lemm.ee/comment/20939144 which only mentions "implicit type coercion" in general.
So, I think probably everyone in the thread is "correct", but you are actually talking past one another.
I think the JS behavior is a bad design choice, but it is well documented and consistent across implementations.
I think it's less about type system, and more about lack of a separate compilation step.
With a compilation step, you can have error messages that developers see, but users don't. (Hopefully, these errors enable the developers to reduce the errors that users see, and just generally improve the UX, but that's NOT guaranteed.)
Without a compilation step, you have to assign some semantics to whatever random source string your interpreter gets. And, while you can certainly make that an error, that would rarely be helpful for the user. JS instead made the choice to, as much as possible, avoid error semantics in favor of silent coercions, conversions, and conflations in order to make every attempt to not "error-out" on the user.
It would be a very painful decade indeed to now change the semantics for some JS source text.
Purescript is a great option. Typescript is okay. You could also introduce a JS-to-JS "compilation" step that DID reject (or at least warn the developer) for source text that "should" be given an error semantic, but I don't know an "off-the-shelf" approach for that -- other than JSLint.
(.)is a valid expression in Haskell. Normally it is the prefix form of the infix operator.that does function composition.(.) (2*) (1+) 3=((2*) . (1+)) 3=2 * (1 + 3)=8.But, the most common use of the word "boob" in my experience in Haskell is the "boobs operator":
(.)(.). It's usage in Haskell is limited (tho valid), but it's appearance in racy ASCII art predates even the first versions on Haskell.Oddly enough, in Haskell (as defined by the report), length is monomorphic, so it just doesn't work on tuples (type error).
Due to the way kinds (types of types) work in Haskell, Foldable instances can only operate over (i.e. length only counts) elements of the last/final type argument. So, for (,) it only counts the second part, which is always there exactly once. If you provided a Foldable for (,,,) it would also have length of 1.
This is my favorite language: GHC Haskell
GHC Haskell:
GHCi> length (2, "foo") 1
"tres bien" is "very good"
"si vous plait" is like "please"
"plus fort" is like "more strength"
I've never studied or learned French, but you can pick up some of this stuff from "throwaway" French in other context and the etymology shared with other languages.
So, basically just the stock U.S. porn phrase translated to French.