They should interview me when I make a purchase and determine the likelihood of me falling for a scam where a family member will save me if I just had an extra day
And the footage itself doesn’t even become illegal even when the trespass was in fact illegal, I heard - can’t require deletion I think? (Of course the property owner or their associates might be bigger than you!)
I had to go back to the first panel to notice the sidewalk pavers & 💨, then looked at last panel again & saw how it zoomed out, indicating she’d been going “against” traffic on the “one-way sidewalk”
A person really does give up a lot of control to Google when they use Chrome. If the article instead said Google was using the model for everything and it was a big privacy gain for consumers that might never have raised eyebrows about whatever size file. They push big updates all day long
These shoppers getting booted really steamed me. Individual stores, individual systems: that’s one (uncomfortable) thing. Sharing the data means disenfranchising. And when they go out of business someday the data of the whole country is sold to the highest bidder.
Wish we could fix it legislatively so they don’t say “terrorism everywhere, need camera everywhere”. (One imagines that Flock CEO would love us to constantly wear bodycams…)
btw on the internet gotta wonder if someone’s gonna read that & be like “oh let’s do it with 20 people inside”
Interesting, didn’t know anything about Wire. Are the ISP/VPN selling your data your main concern? Foreign nations enter your mind as far as threat model? Maybe easier to speak generally on what relatively normal (but nerdy) people might do best to care about
They should interview me when I make a purchase and determine the likelihood of me falling for a scam where a family member will save me if I just had an extra day