Skip Navigation

Posts
4
Comments
326
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Yes. He is now directly and mockingly violating the constitution and an explicit Supreme Court order. It is now a completely naked constitutional crisis for all the public to see.

    Reasonable people have seen it happening since long before today, but today marks a shift from a more covert assault to an open one, and that is noteworthy.

    Eta: I don't mean they were really covert before, either, to be clear. They dropped any remaining veil of plausible deniability today though. And then also let it slip on recording that the intent is to deprive US citizens of due process and ship "terrorists" (read: undesirables) to El Salvador, too. Today is a historic day, sadly.

  • Fucking fascist

  • Sure, but those folks tend to pass the paper bag test in higher numbers than Muslims (mosques) and Latinos (heavy Catholic leaning)

  • I'm thinking mosques and Catholic churches in the you-know-why-hombre parts of town first, but your point remains and probably everyone should pay attention and be concerned

  • This is the one to watch. All of the cases are important, of course, but this one has come to a head. The top layer of the judicial branch has issued an order at odds with the wishes of the Trump administration, and it's the executive branch's constitutional responsibility to see that the order is carried out.

    This is where we find out if our fascist leader has any guardrails left to protect our democracy or if we truly live in a fascist state where people can be disappeared with complete public awareness at the whim and pleasure of ICE.

  • thunder thighs

    I think those are calves

  • bUt mUh StAtEs' RiGhTs

  • I mean, how could he say no?

  • Nobody expects the Trumpian Inquisition!

  • That we know of.

  • The outgroup must grow to feed the machine

  • I kinda assumed they had either already exfiltrated whatever they wanted to add to their AI dataset or had backdoor access at this point. But that's the neat part! No one knows!

  • 9 votes. 2 (maybe) recuse, leaving 7. 3 of those 7 appointed by Trump, another a swing voice but also the same one that apparently thought t had kingly immunity in a way that in the past most reasonable folks thought was un-American.

    I mean, better odds are better odds. But I'm not confident this isn't a bought court already, recusal or not.

    I am about to read the article, I've not read it yet, my comment is based solely on the actors in this particular description.

    Edit:

    Vox's Ian Millhiser reported Wednesday that "if the Supreme Court accepts an argument raised by a federal appeals court, which struck down the federal program, it would bring about one of the biggest judicial power grabs in American history, and hobble the government's ability to do, well, pretty much anything."

    Yup, so far, I'm of the same low confidence

    Edit2, I'll try and stop after this, sorry:

    While "all six conservatives now sitting on the Supreme Court can credit Leo with helping to shepherd their confirmations," the watchdog's report states, the right-wing legal activist is "close personal friends" with Alito and Thomas.

  • Exactly, it's instinct for him. The planners are all the people around him, and they are pushing their plans (see Project 2025, for example), but for Trump all the stuff he says and does is automatic. That's my read, anyway.

  • Are any known backups of the data available for archiving?

  • Fuck that, no one elected DOGE. Transparency was the promise, no?

  • Je suis American and only just learning some French, I'm glad you came along with better notes. Gramercy, in fact!

  • Gramercy, in lieu of "thank you very much." I don't know why, but it's something from Mallory's King Arthur stories that always stuck with me and I think it deserves a revival.

    ETA: for those unaware, it's a conjunction of the French gran merci, which translates the same way you probably suspect: big thanks, or grand thanks, or in other words, thank you very much