Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
48
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • I thought dwayne was a good man ):

  • exactly my point

  • you should write a book

  • yes, in future IF ai replaces me as a programmer(which as explained is not possible), then I shall start working alongside it.

    See cars replaced horses, but not humans, our need for progress is insatiable and I doubt any software program can emulate human intelligence

  • We meet again mr angry autist, and I must say, you have got a bit of an r/unpopularopinion

  • much like everyone else is incompetent

  • nah its at 35, I have still ways to grow

  • age: 21 hairline:31 physical age:101

  • loric for sure

  • sadly the big three stopped making half bloods

  • oh wait you mean something like alphazero or other alpha models which are expert systems baked into one model?

  • :⁠^⁠)

    is it the proof that no progress has been made or no information is public?

  • mixture of experts leads to no where and I know boltzmann brain but I can simply say, being a figment of someone's imagination doesn't decrease my pains and struggles, implying that my pain were the proof of my being, can be fictious but won't change my reality

  • well, how? what issue would this particular solution give rise to?

  • but cant such system be built with open standards, run upon shared public infrastructure

  • well technically someone had to do it, humans can't and in this game of poker only gods can intervene to save the day

  • that means I get the answer, the unfeasibility of the solution is not in itself, but rather in its deployment.

  • ngl, Spotify has become hot ass these days

  • I understand and I think your last paragraph is very poetic! And I agree with you partially, but I think in certain cases, it's better to find the one general case the solution fits to and add the edge cases as it grows.

    But putting the question of model selection aside, do you think this system would be practical, theoretically of course?