Skip Navigation

User banner

arsCynic

@ arsCynic @piefed.social

Posts
3
Comments
87
Joined
9 mo. ago

  • The same 732-byte Python script roots every Linux distribution shipped since 2017

    Jump

  • Here on my Artix* Linux it still asks for the password; *OpenRC systemd, KDE Plasma, Wayland.

  • Age checks could turn internet into an ID checkpoint and would kill anonymity, Proton CEO says

    Jump

  • “This argument is one degree of separation away from a "nothing to hide" fallacy. And as you accurately pointed out, it’s founded on a very unrealistic assurance of an entirely virtuous power.”

    I know, and I am vehemently in opposition to the nothing to hide argument. In fact, the reason I recently distrohopped to Artix was because some Arch package maintainer casually uttered the following on the developer adding the birth date field: “I appreciate the work ahead of time, and the law is the law.” Which is either remarkably naive, ignorant of history, or malicious. Homosexuality is still a crime by some law somewhere. So, yeah, utter nonsense.

    That being said, if the majority of the Web just becomes a place for advertising, gambling, and predominantly fruitless discord due to rampant disinformation, misinformation, trolling, bullying, et cetera, then I think removing anonymity in some way, e.g., for some websites or specific services, could be a solution. Because if the Web goes where it's going now, a cesspool of humanity's worst impulses, I wouldn't see a reason to keep using it and therefore wouldn't care whether there's badly implemented ID verification anyway. Obviously I'd prefer none of this is necessary, that people behave virtuously. But, they don't, so… I also think there's too many laws, and that laws mainly apply to the poor and the working class, and the rich—the perpetuators of most of the world's problems—mostly get off scot-free.

    Ugh, it's all so complex. I don't have the answer. Do you? Is what I'm saying as utterly nonsensical as what that Arch maintainer said? If so, I'd be glad to adjust my position provided civilized and proper reasoning—not that you didn't before, @Disillusionist@piefed.world, but many do not.

  • Age checks could turn internet into an ID checkpoint and would kill anonymity, Proton CEO says

    Jump

  • It's just remarkably disappointing that so many of said cohort is all for freedom or libertarian, but they simultaneously downvote comments into being hidden and offer no counter-arguments. The irony.

    But I sigh at discourse online in general, on all sides, for it's riddled with fallacies. Or even downvotes and upvotes, they mean little to nothing. I know because as an admin I realize there's tons of people who use multiple accounts, not two or three, but tens of accounts, to skew the votes in their favor.

  • Age checks could turn internet into an ID checkpoint and would kill anonymity, Proton CEO says

    Jump

  • “Do you want “toxic speech” to become a crime and punished by a court of law?”

    Bullying and disinformation, absolutely.

    “How exactly would id verification help against that.”

    From the paper What Deters Crime? Comparing the Effectiveness of Legal, Social, and Internal Sanctions Across Countries, citing a meta-analysis:

    “On the whole, this meta-analysis favored rejecting the null hypothesis that legal sanctions have no deterrent effect on crime.” ―Meta Analysis of Crime and Deterrence: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature, by Thomas Rupp (2008)

    The paper concludes as follows:

    Our findings suggest that across societies and cultures, internalized moral standards exert the most powerful restraints on dishonest behavior (see also Campbell, 1964). Policy efforts aimed at promoting moral internalization may be more effective than efforts aimed at increasing the frequency or probability of legal sentences. However, the process by which internalization occurs remains poorly understood, and marks an important direction for future research aimed at reducing crime and enhancing social welfare.

    As I said, is it the best solution? Science hasn't a clear answer either. What does seem to be agreed upon is that:

    • “The perceived likelihood that one will be caught is far more effective as a deterrent than the severity of the punishment.” ―Wikipedia - Deterrence: Likelihood vs. severity [Also stated in the aforementioned meta-analysis.]
    • That having the moral compass to realize something is wrong, will decrease someone succumbing to such wrongdoings.

    My hypothesis is that complete anonymity, so a low probability of getting caught, increases toxic behavior because people suffer no bad consequences whatsoever and therefore never learn. Ever hung around a spoiled kid? They're the worst. The same happens online. Naturally, proper journalists and whistleblowers are a different thing, absolute anonymity is crucial for them. But how to square both these realities remains to be discovered.

  • Age checks could turn internet into an ID checkpoint and would kill anonymity, Proton CEO says

    Jump

  • I’m fine with that.

    When done correctly, and someone's ID remains anonymous from the general public if they wish so, then I'd also be fine with that. Way too many trolls and other forms of bad actors on the Web who intentionally or unintentionally use ad hominems or other toxic communication, it's so hopelessly divisive and draining.

    I recently saw a documentary about looksmaxxing. The forums these kids peruse echo the deepest pits of hell; insisting on suicide and all the forms of psychological bullying one cannot even imagine.

    Whether it's the best solution I don't know, it's probably not. But from my point of view, taking away the anonymity from the authorities would significantly lower the amount of depravity on the Web. The crux in this whole matter is of course that the authorities are virtuous, fair, just. If they are not, which all too often is the case, then removing anonymity can be an equally dangerous thing as well.

    Obviously everything boils down to education, which needs a complete overhaul. But that's something that will take decades if not a century to turn humanity into a predominantly virtuous species.

    ⚜︎ https://www.arscyni.cc/: modernity ∝ nature.

  • Age checks could turn internet into an ID checkpoint and would kill anonymity, Proton CEO says

    Jump

  • I’m fine with that.

    When done correctly, and someone's ID remains anonymous from the general public if they wish so, then I'd also be fine with that. Way too many trolls and other forms of bad actors on the Web who intentionally or unintentionally use ad hominems or other toxic communication, it's so hopelessly divisive and draining.

    I recently saw a documentary about looksmaxxing. The forums these kids peruse echo the deepest pits of hell; insisting on suicide and all the forms of psychological bullying one cannot even imagine.

    Whether it's the best solution I don't know, it's probably not. But from my point of view, taking away the anonymity from the authorities would significantly lower the amount of depravity on the Web. The crux in this whole matter is of course that the authorities are virtuous, fair, just. If they are not, which all too often is the case, then removing anonymity can be an equally dangerous thing as well.

    Obviously everything boils down to education, which needs a complete overhaul. But that's something that will take decades if not a century to turn humanity into a predominantly virtuous species.

  • Students are speeding through their online degrees in weeks, alarming educators

    Jump

  • “Why wouldn’t you do that?” Williams asked

    Gee, I dunno, maybe you wanted to learn something?

    Curiosity has been stamped out during high school for most people. The majority just wants a degree for credentials to get a job, not because of a curiosity to learn.

    Contemporary standardized education is archaic. I totally understand why people would want to speedrun through it. I'd prefer a revolution in the education system though:

    → Let's teach for mastery -- not test scores | Sal Khan; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-MTRxRO5SRA

  • Engineer open-sources DIY radar system that's 95% cheaper than $250,000 commercial offerings, has 20 kilometer range — Moroccan engineer designs Aeris-10 radar, shares it on GitHub

    Jump

  • Now do the Internet please.

  • systemd(ont)

    Jump

  • It looks like it and all of the linked websites were created in 2015-2017 and never updated.

    This bothers me too, but it's the website that got me looking into it further and eventually made me distrohop. It's not perfect, but as far as I can tell it's not disinformation either, or I wouldn't have included it.

  • systemd(ont)

    Jump

  • You aren’t running critical military intelligence network or something.

    That's not the point. Performance tweaking operating systems is fun for the heck of it. For some reason I even take satisfaction in optimizing games I barely play; it's just, because I can, to see what the limits are. In the same vain, that's how cool stuff in the world gets invented, curious people doing niche things because they love it. Not because of military urgency which is an often regurgitated myth.

  • Manjaro Linux Team Goes on Strike, Threatens to Fork the Project

    Jump

  • Can confirm it happens often here too indeed.

  • Manjaro Linux Team Goes on Strike, Threatens to Fork the Project

    Jump

  • Just fork already. EndeavourOS exists, an awesome distro, so this threat is a triviality.

  • Is Wikipedia's Volunteer Model Facing a Generational Crisis?

    Jump

  • Thank you. Totally misinterpreted the word present as in being present, causing me to think the sentence didn't make sense. I need to sleep.

  • Is Wikipedia's Volunteer Model Facing a Generational Crisis?

    Jump

  • Does someone understand the following sentence?

    “then present that knowledge in ways that break the virtuous cycle Wikipedia depends on.”

  • Kristi Noem Refuses To Answer Whether ICE Disarmed Alex Pretti Before Fatally Shooting Him

    Jump

  • I don't usually lower myself to ad hominems, but goddamn demon spawn shit-for-brains. She's more disturbing than possessed Regan MacNeil in The Exorcist.

  • Jeff Bezos said the quiet part out loud — hopes that you'll give up your PC to rent one from the cloud

    Jump

  • I'd give up computing altogether, or even commit suicide if living mainly means being subservient to these soulless parasites.

  • Mark Zuckerberg gifted noise-canceling headphones to his Palo Alto neighbors because of the non-stop construction around his 11 homes

    Jump

  • That's it. From now on I dedicate my life to siphoning as much money from these unethical soulless bastards as possible to divert it to society-beneficial non-profits. More Linux, more skateparks, better education, more affordable housing, universal healthcare, et cetera. Never have I ever loathed one person so much as Mark Zuckerberg.

    🎅 “Yippee ki-yay, motherfucker.”

    ⚜︎ arscyni.cc: modernity ∝ nature.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • "His name is already on the image where he signed it."

    1. With every "Save Image As" → "Share" cycle the picture quality tends to degrade. Sooner or later the signature becomes illegible or simply cropped out. Just look at the image quality difference now, after only being one day old!
    2. Moreover, few people click a link to the source to check out the artist. But, even fewer read the signature, search for the name, and start browsing from there. Let alone the hassle of reverse image searching.
  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump

  • Respect the artists, add the source. Goddamn it's not that difficult: Tommy Siegel @ https://imginn.com/p/DSnDl53Dvhd/.

    In case the proxy website above doesn't work anymore, "DSnDl53Dvhd" is the post's id on that society-eroding website owned by that soulless billionaire.