Once I found the plethora of good but >$10 pens, I had a lot of fun. The Precise V5 is one of my fav, and at the job I had where people would frequently need to borrow my pen, that received steady unprompted compliments.
Some basic Google sleuthing shows he's a centrist and hasn't made a public political donation since the 90s and that was $5000.
He has the second largest private personal charity, Dalio Philanthropies, which seems to dabble in a bit of everything.
Private charities don't thrill me, because it can be a huge source of dark money and it still maintains the charity owner's personal will and keeps their personal influence level high instead of just donating money to be used however the people receiving donations feels is best.
This link gives a little more specific insight to what he participates in, but it's still fairly vague. He's basically trying to do the Gates/Buffet give it all away by the time you die thing, so it's probably as good as one can expect from a hedge fund guy.
Article says there's a pepper ball launcher and a glass hammer, so this thing is mainly for surveillance and mild distractions, which is much better than I was prepared to read.
"Currently, an officer's job is to run toward gunfire, alone, with no support or intel—basically a standoff. With our drones, they're not alone; they know what the suspect looks like, what they're doing, and we take point around every corner.
"We usually find the shooter before they do and keep them occupied. Every officer who's seen this live has said they want it."
If this actually encourages them to do their jobs, great. If this is just a kickback to private industry and further militarizing schools while police still sit cowering, than I know where they can dock those drones...
I love brewery wash for my water bottle! Soap or bleach always seemed to give me a funny taste or order. It may have been in my head, but I didn't like it and it led me to cleaning it less often.
Decided to hit it with StarSan one time it got icky and cleaned it right up with no taste or smell.
I try to run it through the dishwasher more often, but if I put something odd in the bottle or it sat out for a long time, now I StarSan it.
From looking up more usage, as it isn't a word I often hear, it seems by nature to be neutral, but context can direct it to be more positive or negative.
If I heard someone say it in conversation, it would put a lot of emphasis on the tone of the conversation to take the meaning. I'd imagine it being used more sarcastically, as it sounds like a fancy word for someone with shallow knowledge of a subject.
"John won't shut up about that trendy new art exhibit."
"Oh yeah, he's a real dilettante all of a sudden!" 😒
John had never shown interest in art before, but now that he saw it and either liked it or pretended to like it to show off his "higher appreciation of culture" than his friends now he keeps talking about it even though he doesn't know anything about art.
I wouldn't say it's impossible to use in a positive manner, but being dismissive feels more likely. If someone used it that way I'd feel I was potentially missing out on a joke at first.
I think you nailed this one. Poser was my first thought, but a poser is someone who fakes an interest to fit in. Dilettante has that gatekeeping aspect to it, which seems important to OP's description.
Probably 70% home, 25% takeaway, and 5% eating out.
Takeaway and going out used to be switched, but the gf's been pulling a lot of OT at the hospital this year, so it's hard for us to get together most days, and sometimes she doesn't know when she'll get home so it's easier for her to grab something for herself or us on the way home.
I prefer cooking at home because it's cheaper, potentially healthier, and I hate all the trash generated from takeout, but it's hard for me to meal plan when our schedules are so off from each other.
We do still make all our breakfasts and lunches, so it's mainly just dinner that's the question.
Them being compliant is a defensive behavior called freezing. If they get hurt fighting you, they won't be able to escape, so they're waiting to see what you are going to do before they decide if fighting is worth the risk.
I started working at a wild animal rehab this year. I've fed a few hundred squirrels, dozens of song birds, some really cool raptors, and a good handful of mammals.
I consider my time with them positive, but they really don't want much to do with us. I just released an owl this weekend and it bit me multiple times as I was trying to let it go. That's the attitude it takes for it to survive, so getting a positive attitude back is typically not an outcome I should, or realistically want to see.
The person being hostile in this thread is going pretty extreme. We shouldn't be touching or feeding animals directly, but many do need indirect human presence to survive. They evolved with us to an extent, and they take advantage of our food storage and waste and some of the molding of the environment that we do by creating fields and farmland.
Most animal injuries I see are from cars, pets, manmade structures, and cutting down trees animals live in. What people are feeding the birds is likely a very small portion of their diet, as they eat pretty constantly. Keep your bird and squirrel stations clean and provide shelter from predators and you likely aren't hurting anything in the grand scheme of things. A loose dog or cat is way worse IMO.
I'm not going to tell you your methodology is wrong, you give a perfectly valid reason for doing what you do.
I don't so much as avoid them, I will still often check what they are saying, but I look at what they're saying to other people. If I know someone is trolly or has a pretty shitty bias, if I see them misrepresenting things, it offers me a way to maybe offer a contrary opinion to those they're talking to, or I can see they may be the wrong person to talk to about ethical/moral things but may still be good for getting answers to technical questions from.
There's people here I just won't engage with at all just as in the real world, but just like in life there's people I know to just avoid certain topics or opinions with but they're still ok people or can be helpful in the right context.
Now, both online and in real life, if I encounter one of those people who swears everyone is always starting shit with them for no reason, often it becomes obvious that there is a reason why they have so many problems with other people, and usually they are the common denominator. Not always, but I'd say the majority of the time. And especially someone proud of telling strangers that they have a big list of people they don't like or want to waste their time on, it makes me wonder why. That's why it's a red flag. You can tell me that's who you are, and I don't have to decide that second to avoid you, but I'm certainly going to feel you out a bit more than I would someone else that decides to give me a friendlier first impression. That's me looking out for me, just as your methodology does for you.
I just see myself as someone who gives strangers the benefit of the doubt to start with, and that is yours to mess up. Some people don't trust strangers and they have to earn that initial trust first. I don't know you or your story so I won't hold that against you, but I do feel that tells me something about you. You have to actively work on it for me to outright distrust you, but at the same time, don't think of my trust and friendliness as naivete. I'm paying attention very closely, I'm just letting you show me who you are rather than forming my own assumptions.
I avoid most controversial comment threads since I'm not here for drama. I do have a few people I put user tags on if I see them have consistent bad takes or if they treat other people poorly so I can avoid interacting with them. There hasn't been any need for me to actually block anyone.
This isn't directed at you personally, but these threads pop up from time to time, and for how few people are active commenters here, to have 100 blocks and the need to share that feels like something of a red flag to me. I don't think I've blocked more than a dozen people in about 30 years of being online.
I never expected there were so many other long haired men here secretly dealing with hair issues! I thought I'd been dealing with this alone the last few years since I decided to stop buzzcutting myself. Now I wish we had a more active hair community. Not necessarily male only, as this post seems to show we have "human hair" and not "guy hair" or "girl hair."
Appreciate the concern. The air fryer has all but eliminated my home frying. I always hated throwing out the oil, but I know it's not great to keep around, so I was never big into frying at home.
I often see it described as a rolling billboard for businesses to plaster with their logos. I use it to tell me what places to never patronize, so it really does work. Maybe not as attended, but I certainly take notice.
To be fair to the zoo, everything they are asking for aside from the horses is available from RodentPro. I don't like the idea of taking public donations like this because I'd worry about some weirdo poisoning something.
Animals with known medical histories will sometimes get "reused" after they expire. Time, money, and effort was put into these animals that didn't make it, and in the wild, they would have served this purpose anyway. But those animals aren't pets either.
Really the only news here is the public solicitation. I don't think it's the best look for the zoo, I don't know their financial situation, but I can't imagine they will be flooded with animals to make it worth the people this will turn off. The only thing we ask the public for is donations to buy food, canned or bagged commercial pet foods, or donations of fish that people catch.
I really like a lot of Megadeth's Hidden Treasures since they don't pop up randomly so much I've never gotten tired of them.
Angry Again, 99 Ways to Die, Breakpoint, Go to Hell, Diadems. All great stuff.