Not necessarily. Moreso I am saying it might be worth trying to understand these a bit more because there are some pretty serious issues with using this tech in the ways you proposed that it feels to me like you might not be aware of.
these AI companies have sold a bill of goods that I don't think really exists.
qwen 3.6 27b runs on an AMD AI MAX 395+ fairly well.
I have one in a laptop with 64gb of ram that I bought before things went too crazy for $2200. Not sure how much one is now.
Anyway, you don't need a datacenter and that's why I personally think the current AI "boom" is a bubble around a nascent tech that's not really ready for lots of the situations it's been sold for. 🤷♂️
Everyone here I have seen is trying to help you, friend. I realize you may not be in a place to understand it, but the last thing people who are responding to you want is for you to continue to suffer these symptoms you're now apparently trying to turn into a joke.
Can a company market a submarine but then define a submarine as a lamp in their ToS and you'd just be out of luck?
I haven't read the case, but you seem to be coming from a place of "the terms absolve them" when the suit may be more about false advertising?
I am a premium subscriber and don't get a lot of ads, but I have also noticed some UX changes recently that do indeed seem kinda dark pattern/marketing-ish.
I will be mildly watching this hoping for that sweet $2.37 settlement check....
Because reading code isn't the same act as writing it.
It is way easier to miss a subtle issue when you are reviewing a bunch of code you didn't write than it is in code you actually wrote yourself using your own brain.
For how long?
Investors will liquidate.