I had a an issue with Elan touchpad were one connects the laptop to the power and the touchpad input starts lagging. This happens in all distros too. It is not too terrible since most of my workflow is on the keyboard.
Well if that was your original intent then you must have known that only native speakers would have understood the *
Lyricism*, which is a weird thing to do since this is an international and English speaking community. So I guess you deserve the benefit of the doubt.
By the way the link fails to mention music, which is disappointing since its common that our mothers sing about the sea when we were children.
Omarchy is just an opinion, this opinion are the configuration files and the packages installed by default. You can get a better setup for yourself by using plain Arch, installing Hyprland and configuring dotfiles on your own. I suggest using the archinstall script if you do not want to do the manual Arch install. In that installation you can just select the Hyprland desktop option and it will do everything for you. Then you can transfer the needed configuration files from your Omarchy setup. There will not be any more need for configurations if you do not want it.
There are loads of people who share their dotfiles tips and tricks online, I share my dotfiles in Codeberg, have a window managers community, and a work in progress website with window manager tips.
I read that article and agreed with everything, when Omarchy started getting popular I read what packages had installed by default and could not believe that has so many packages installed through bash scripts or that mise thing. Not to mention that it had so many configurations just as they come from their original program, no git prompt no fzf integrations, etc. I think they did not even set up apparmor nor ufw, so the only thing of value I could see were the cool themes.
Also they had some pretty bad keybinds for navigating, like F11 for fullscreen, and some for quickly accessing twitter and chatbots on the browser.
Open Source has nothing to do whether data involved in the program/service is available, it refers to the source code. This source code is the recipe of the program, it is written in a programming language. When a project is open source people who make modifications to that code must publish the modifications with the same licence(generally speaking), thus ensuring a mutual knowledge exchange.
As for the data in Lemmy, yes you can see who upvoted posts and comments but it is not available in the interface. There is a website called Lemvotes or something that does this. To be clear, a project can be open source and not expose data of their users, for example the Matrix protocol.
The worst part it's not that LLM's do it, its that humans do it. I don't mind the occasional use of it on things that would benefit from a quick scan (like a website nav bar) but too many people go overboard and sugar coat their text with icons and corpo mumbo jumbo.
That is interesting, but one can be free and sad at the same time right?