When search results are just links to content related to a topic, the provider isn’t responsible for the accuracy of the content, which is created by others. But they are responsible for their own summaries and other provider-created content.
This is clearly a reasonable line to draw. This is not content created by others. It's your robot. Fix your shit.
Saying "I slapped a disclaimer on my libelous robot that says that it may generate libel" doesn't grant you the right to be libelous.
This has been my experience as well. Designers love to slop it up in them because there's no versioning or any way to tell what something looked like when it was actually developed. It's seemingly impossible to set and maintain scope in them. Figma has some versioning support, but it's probably the worst of all of them from a "which board are you even talking about?" perspective because they have 8000 C&P'd Figma boards all of which contain similar things and the links are 1500 character URLs with a bunch of UUIDs in them.
Nope dude, I actually know how to type em dashes. It isn't very difficult on lemmy (which is markdown formatted). It's done by three regular dashes in a row: ---. But I can do it on Macbook (opt+shift+dash) as well as on Linux (u+2014). I like em dashes and the bots can take them from my cold, dead hands. In this case, I used the markdown formatting because I was replying on my phone.
No, but I get them sent to me by others in my company. Usually someone puts a "board" together that is a bunch of screen captures into some huge, difficult to navigate thing with a bunch of "post it notes" and stuff.
Yeah this kinda fits into "CEO said a thing" journalism. Even if he's correct --- and intuitively it seems like he might be --- people should ask for evidence. But our corporate press is useless and/or complicit and almost never asks a follow-up question.
Sometimes it eats the ice cream and sometimes it punches you in the groin. It can make mistakes.