Skip Navigation

Posts
2
Comments
343
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • They're used to indicate context because that's how the English language works, my dude.

    Sure, in other languages they may not be. But it's universal in many Western languages.

  • Yeah, I get that. Unless you either read about it, or have worked in a corporate environment with calendars that have events pop up on them without your direct intervention, it's not something that would be intuitive.

    What's important is that nobody has access to your stuff. They just want you to think they do.

  • No, pie are squared.

  • Keep in mind, nobody is "getting to" your calendar. They don't have access to it at all.

    They simply send an event invitation to your email address. And because you're invited to a thing, your mail app "helpfully" adds it to your calendar.

    They don't know whether you have a calendar. They just send them to thousands of email addresses hoping that somebody will see them.

  • This has been going on for years.

    Scammers can send calendar invitations to anybody. Google helpfully adds them to your calendar automatically. And you often don't get the invitation in email, since it gets added directly to your calendar.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Accessibility is about providing equivalent experiences. Presentation absolutely matters because bold, italics, etc. are used to indicate context. Markup exists to indicate context, not the other way around.

    How familiar are you with ADA 508 and the latest WCAG standards?

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • No. They are tested standards, and were created based on extensive data and research.

  • Removed Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • "Strong" and "emphasis" are used for accessibility purposes.

    For example, person blind since birth won't know what "italic" looks like. But they will understand the concept of emphasizing something.

    And before you reply to me: I'm talking about compliance standards designed for use throughout the Internet. I'm not just sharing my opinion on this. My opinions are irrelevant. When I work in UX, I follow the standards.

  • There is nothing to correct because pie ARE good

  • Manul

  • OK, the text was wrapping weird on my screen and it didn't look like that was part of the same path.

    Have you tried giving it a simpler path?

  • It needs to be pointed to a specific mount point, not just the mounts folder.

    For example, /mounts/mountname

    After creating the mount point name, setting the permissions correctly, and updating fstab, it should start to show up as a fixed drive.

  • You need to create a permanent mount point for it. Then it will be seen as a non-removable drive.

    I experienced the same thing when I installed Bazzite.

  • What your mom, your dad, and I did last night.

  • "ability to pay for food" is not constraint

  • The consensus is "only men ask about that."

  • You're welcome. And by the way, your sister is my favorite

  • They are each great in their own way, and in their own context. I can't love one more than the other, but I love them differently.

  • You said doo-doo

  • Defend?

    Jump
  • Then it's a party.