Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
318
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • I mean books 3 (Xenocide) and 4 (Children of the Mind), as well as his The Memory of Earth series.

  • Better than the hyper-mormon ending to Ender's Game~

  • Yeah another contender of 'fantastic show that produces an absurd ending that kind of ruins it'. But it was a wild ride the whole time, and I enjoyed it.

  • In Battlestar Galactica, humanity has fled earth after a hostile takeover by AI. On their last remaining ark fleeing to a habitable planet are Cylons, AI disguised as humans, some not even aware they ARE cylons. Fantastic show.

  • Maybe we don't need to make concessions on behalf of fucking Hitler when we're dealing with the actual return of fascism on a world scale. A real 'read the room' kind of thing.

  • The movie isn't for everyone even if you agree with its message. It's a really dry satire. I enjoyed it because the movie made me feel like I was going crazy as I watched it, and that feeling has stuck with me.

  • Is it insanity? What egregious win did a trans kid have that defiled the sanctity of organized sport? Or is it all media outrage being used to distract us from realizing everyone with a 7-digit-or-less bank account all fundamentally want the same thing, which is at odds with those with more?

  • That sounds like something a carapaced bottom-dwelling aquatic scavenger would say...

  • It's a movie, it doesn't need to be "useful". Some people were entertained, some people were emotionally affected. It was successful art. And we're still talking about it.

  • The incessant lurch of time makes us crab and there's nothing we can do about it

  • They also resent anti-runon-sentence propaganda

  • ...you know this was a Japanese movie, right?

  • Lord of the Yeets

  • Not programming, but the plot of Shin Godzilla was about bureaucratic red tape holding back the actual solutions.

  • It's a movie, highly recommend!

  • Seen "Cashback"?

  • Ah, gotcha.

    Well, if mod actions are reported to admins, they already do a review on the mod, I imagine. So in this case, this post should lead to a mod review, right? Not sure if OP had already gone through official channels. I personally haven't had to look into this topic before.

    So I guess, if admins see that a mod is removing factual information to fit their agenda, that should be grounds for removal. Wikipedia has robust moderation and certainly couldn't be considered misinformation.

  • Removal of misinformation should require a mod discussion/panel review. Sources can be deemed to be misinformation by a mod majority vote and the list they maintain should be public.