Very interesting. Fixing one of the most common flaws of LLMs. If you can force them to follow proper structure they can generate better batch of test data samples, correct mathematical proofs in Lean, proper conlang words and sentences, proper json output for latter use by another tools, and obviously correct code generation in a specific version of a programming language.
While you're right. It would be better to say something like "I need it for my country" or "US needs it". Since English doesn't distinguish between inclusive and exclusive "we", it can lead to the conclusion that the commenter supposes people reading their comment are from US as well.
You're the one bringing a fact, you're the one supposed to source it.
Anyway, your source doesn't talk about any increase of prevalence, how can we know there's a crisis from your source? Could be just that we diagnose more cases these times (or even the same digits, since we don't have evolution data in your source). Even worse: your source literally state Digital media as a means of preventing mental health issues by spreading educative content. Nowhere does your source state that digital media is THE cause of the young mental health "crisis".
This doesn't make sense. Forbidding social media is as stupid as forbidding video games, it's old people not trying to find the real cause and instead passing measures which will be completely useless. Social media doesn't necessarily mean Meta
Why are you friend with stupid people?