My friend, you yourself have been implying this whole time that Google's infrastructure is too vital and important to remove - how do you not see that this means they are too powerful? Remember trust-busting? Remember anti-monopoly activism? Nobody thought that by breaking up the railroads people wouldn't need trains anymore, but they understood the danger of allowing a single company to have such market dominance and what it that would mean for consumers. Same thing here. And yes, I'm aware this requires continual diligence as the phone companies that were once PacBell are now bigger than it was, but that lacking of failure to continue enforcing anti-trust doesn't mean the concept is wrong.
No single company should be allowed to have such influence that very idea of them going away leads to the very doomsday considerations we've been talking about. That's what this is all about.
I think people and societies are vastly more resilient that you're implying, and would survive an admittedly complex 6 month period to switch necessary services. Would it be hard? Yeah absolutely. But I've never accepted "but it's so hard!!" as valid reason to hold off positive progress.
What "normal solutions" are actually in progress with any real potential of happening? Be for fucking real.
Meanwhile what insane doomsday scenario do you think would happen if Google services were banned and people had the given period to find alternatives?
You're talking about a fantasy solution that doesn't exist then blowing the consequences of this possible action wildly out of proportion in gross hyperbole.
Yes you're right, blocking a single corporation is totally similar to dropping a nuclear weapon on a civilian site, you've shown me the error of my ways.
I dunno about iPhone but for Android the loops app isn't on the app store yet because the whole thing is still in dev. Once you get your invite email there's a link on the site to download the APK for the app.
Yes, I'm sure this kind of conversation happens. But that's about it. I feel confident nobody, nobody, on earth cares about Gatorade enough to organically make the meme in question. Like what kind of psychopath is putting that kind of importance on fucking Gatorade, even as a joke? This is an astroturfed corporate meme, y'all.
Maybe I'm the outlier, but I don't think normal people are out here having significant conversations about Gatorade on the regular in the first place. And I sure as hell don't believe that anyone organically genuinely gives even half a shit what anyone else calls it. Just call it "shit water" like everyone else and more on.
I tried googling this to see if I was missing some reference or something and it led to strange google behavior I've never seen before... When I search "je ne suis pas français, chappeau" without the quotation marks, Google automatically changes the French to English in the search bar when I hit the search button.
Anyone else experienced this? For what possible fucking purpose would that exist?
Maybe I'm doing something wrong, but I can't cook eggs for shit in ceramic. Give me a stainless steel or teflon pan and I can knock out a perfect french-style omelet, but give me a ceramic pan and suddenly I'm clueless. I genuinely don't understand what could possibly make such a significant difference, but I swear it's true.
I can't decide if I should post the "wait, it's all the failures of capitalism?" or "wait, it's all systemic racism?" meme, cuz it's wait it's all both (always has been).
Biggest sellout in history. I'm just glad I saw the writing on the wall long in advance when he would talk all the time about "community" but literally never engaged with it at all (the only time he even addressed commenters was when their comments were literally printed on paper and handed to him).
My friend, you yourself have been implying this whole time that Google's infrastructure is too vital and important to remove - how do you not see that this means they are too powerful? Remember trust-busting? Remember anti-monopoly activism? Nobody thought that by breaking up the railroads people wouldn't need trains anymore, but they understood the danger of allowing a single company to have such market dominance and what it that would mean for consumers. Same thing here. And yes, I'm aware this requires continual diligence as the phone companies that were once PacBell are now bigger than it was, but that lacking of failure to continue enforcing anti-trust doesn't mean the concept is wrong.
No single company should be allowed to have such influence that very idea of them going away leads to the very doomsday considerations we've been talking about. That's what this is all about.