Skip Navigation

Posts
3
Comments
693
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • My initial thought was "would chemists theoretically be less into labor protections than plumbers"?

    I guess that puts me in a third bucket.

  • Capitalist.

  • I think it's absolutely wild how archaic some systems are. And the worst offenders are those regulated by financial and medical industry laws. I have an account with one financial account that is protected only by password that is 12 characters max with special characters limited to just a few. I don't know how they haven't been breached and then sued into oblivion.

    I'm fine with companies enforcing 2FA. Bitwarden is addressing the current weakest link in the chain: users.

  • Mike Flanagan was at one point signed up with Netflix to do a TV series adaptation of the Something is Killing the Children comics. It fell through. I want to see that series happen, very free reign to Flanagan with just a little bit of reeling in his long monologues.

  • Super short attention span, just what I look for in a medical professional.

  • Reminds me of mowing the fields. The mice and snakes would speed out of the long grass in front of the tractor and the farm dogs would be going to town on them.

  • Sure, until I read it's a synonym for "pecker smoocher". Difficult for me to explain that one away.

  • When you say "Chinese" becomes lingua franca, do you mean Mandarin? Cantonese? Yue? Hakka? Other? If Mandarin, do you mean Jilu? Jiaolio? Other?

    I don't think "Chinese" or any sinitic language ever becomes the global language. Translation is becoming so simple, I would expect any new global initiative can work in 3-4 languages simultaneously.

    UN headquarters relocating - I think it would be more likely the UN collapses and is replaced by something else with China leading.

    The Chinese movie industry is already huge, we just don't see much of it in the US.

    Lots of Chinese people aren't into fengshui. That's kind of a bizarre stereotype for you to pick out of everything mentioned.

    The aerospace industry in China has a ways to go before they can be classified in the same tier as Airbus. They are getting better, but still heavily rely on borrowing designs instead of creating their own.

    Baidu, HarmonyOS, a computer OS - fine by me to add more options.

    What I actually hope is the idea of a single global superpower dies completely. It's not even the current reality for the US; it's just propaganda.

  • It also says "pecker smoocher". And because "qwar" sounds awfully close to "queer", my assumption would be it's a homophobic slur and I will avoid using it / judge anyone who does use it harshly.

    I will take someone responding with "qwar means qwar" as they know it's a homophobic slur and they're trying to be hateful while dodging the social repercussions of being a bigot.

  • you either get a shitty Gif, or something along the lines of "hey."

    So same result as when men message first.

  • Some of their older lyrics had some homophobic bullshit in them, for which they have since apologized. I read one such apology from one of them and it felt pretty genuine to me, FWIW.

    So Juggalos I would expect to be inclusive of LGBT+ people, but no group that big is going to be perfectly in lock step on something like that.

  • I was thinking more for user benefit, for those who want to stay on FB. If they could know setting their VPN to a German server would give them German law protections, for example.

  • I wonder how they determine what needs to be moderated under which country's rules. If one were to start accessing FB from the US through a VPN set to somewhere in the EU, if that would result in showing the user a moderated feed.

  • Boycott - to abstain from or act together in abstaining from using, buying, dealing with, or participating in as an expression of protest or disfavor or as a means of coercion.

    Why, yes. I think he's right. Dadgum, he's just so smart.

  • Let's not victim blame the vampire prey now. They do not owe a blood-sucking villain their time nor respect.

  • Peer vetting? So one has to take on an unpaid part time job to get on the dating platform?

    And men vetted by peer men? The ones who are a sampling that will absolutely include some of the toxic online variety we are all trying to avoid?

    I simply think initial vetting will never be enough. People aren't dumb, they are able to behave until they have someone alone before showing their true colors. My real skepticism is that any Fediverse platform would have strong controls to identify and actually block bad people. Mainstream dating platforms have processes to deal with stalkers and sexual assaulters, they permanently block people from the platform and contact local law enforcement at times. A federated dating platform would have none of those things, unless they're attached to a major corporation like Threads is to Facebook, which would defeat the purpose.

  • You have way more faith in humanity than I do. I think after 1-2 and the novelty wears off, a lot of people would just thumbs up without reading.

    And even if people stay diligent in rating first comments, it will take 0.2 seconds for bad actors to realize they can just save their bullshit for message #2.