I personally suppose humans all (or 99%+, there are always statistical outliers) have a consciousness actually, but that doesn't mean I can use it as a fact when making an argument. For example, if you do use it as a fact, then why doesn't monkeys have a consciousness, pigs, cats, muskitoes, trees, planks, too, etc etc etc.
Math is based on the idea that 1+1=2 and you take that as granted. I can live with that, it seems reasonable. All humans have a consciousness? Not accepting that if you infer that just because a machine can mimic a human brain, it thus also will have even the possibility to have a consciousness.
Do you think a machine can have a quala, the experience we "experience" because we have a consciousness?
What a moronic take, we cannot prove consciousness (except our own of course) so it'd be you who must prove it can be implemented in a turing machine. Not me.
I'm a lurker, I potentially comment but usually there is not much to add when the pros have posted, so if I'd try to promote my secure, takedownsafe P2P sharing protocol (if people started using it, everyone could have a web-space, backups, a "drop-box", an online presence, and more), it'd be kicked?
I'm just trying to understand where I am, the overall rule is completely understandable.
I have just recently heard of claude.md scripts, care to share some (horror) stories to a newb?