Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)U
Posts
1
Comments
16
Joined
6 mo. ago

  • You are looking at this vote the wrong way around. Voting for the bill meant voting for the derogation of chat control, i.e. voting against chat control. The reason chat control passed isn't because the majority voted "for" chat control, it's because not enough voted "against" in a move where if less than 361 voted for the derogation it would automatically be reinstated.

  • So what about stingrays?

  • True, but at the same time, especially with Japanese restaurants, there's usually a correlation

  • Those are very different things, yes. You can vote for them to take your rights. But once you have voted them away guess what, you don't have them anymore. The Germans were also not able to vote the dictatorship away, it took a lot of a very different kind of effort to end that one

  • Yes, just like Germany

  • There's nothing wrong with being gay or trans. Absolutely nothing. Christians are bad people if they believe that, you should stop identifying with that.

    Don't worry, I don't hate you, I just hate your christianity. Love the person, hate the religion.

  • "I don't hate you, I just hate what you are"

    Christians truly don't hear themselves when they talk

  • They always forget the pink triangles when talking about the Holocaust

  • Just for your information, it only works in combination with suppressing Testosterone. as long as testosterone is present in high levels it will come back

  • How is this a joke? Am I the only one that doesn't get Trump's "jokes"? To me it just looks like a demented idiot with a foot in his mouth

  • Thanks, I'll try with sakurajima.moe and see how it goes.

  • Thanks, I guess I have to find some Japanese accounts to follow and see how mbin takes care of it. Will also try to open an account while over there to see if it still works when back home

  • Fediverse @lemmy.world

    Misskey instance?

  • There are other ways to ban social media for minors that don't go through full fledged online IDs for everything. But you seem to want to ignore that, it's a false dichotomy.

    Banning social media for minors (or better yet, opaque algorithmic feeds for everyone) = Good.

    Trying to achieve that by giving overreaching powers to a government, that can be used as a tool of oppression when democracy wavers = very bad.

    As for low trust societies, mate, I've been gassed, beaten up and shot at with rubber bullets by riot police in Spain, for the egregious crime of peacefully protesting. It's a country where the memory of the dictatorship, and it's power structures, are still very much alive. Francoism never fully left

  • I don't want them to use it. I agree with all your points.

    I strongly disagree that mandatory ID on the net is the solution to this.

    It also fascinates me that you'd think putting such a tool, with all the trouble it could cause if our countries stop being democracies, in the hands of government as a purported solution to children being on social media. That's throwing out the baby with the bathwater