That's not because of an organization trying to make Finland ignore the EU legislation using strategies that then cause us to run headlong against a wall, though.
This was because PalPa, the company responsible for maintaining Finland's recycling system was (and is) a corrupt heap of shit.
It's owned by the largest breweries and they used it for keeping smaller and foreign companies out if business. You couldn't get a right to use Finnish bottles –> You had to pay a steep punishment tax for using non-recyclable bottles.
They successfully argued that washing bottles from that many sources would be impossible to organize, so the EU required PalPa to start accepting crushable PET bottles, which are easy to produce without any active coöperation by PalPa.
PalPa(...tine?) was hoping that they could still somehow block this from happening, so they framed the change as Evil EU forcing Finland to stop washing bottles. And when the PET bottles were indeed accepted in the end, they dismantled the whole bottle washing system in Finland so that they wouldn't be held accountable for their lies.
So, it's the same thing that happened to our regional bus network (vakiovuorot), basically. And what's currently happening to our railways.
In a way yes, probably. But at the same time, it means you have one less awesome thing to enjoy on this planet.
Putting more stuff in washable bottles than before happens in many places? Are you sure?
In Finland the deposit for bottles of one litre or more have a deposit of 0,40 €.
(And what many foreigners don't understand is that we are not anti-recycling, so it's not a problem that the deposit is inside the prices you see in the shop. So, if you see 1,59 € as the price of a bottle of lemonade, 1,59 € is what you pay. Many countries have a system where the deposit is added to the price so that people would think more negatively about it and they'd sell more of the bottles with the text "NO DEPOSIT!!" on them, so people coming from those countries are easily confused by not having to add anything to the prices in their heads.)
I once told a person why I'm not hiring them, unprompted.
I was looking for fundraisers to find donors for NGOs, and a young woman I was interviewing had actually been living abroad in an exchange program that kind of included tasks that ought to have brought her skills useful in the job. But, with no amount of prying and hinting was I able to get her to mention that. Or in any other manner do anything that sounds like they were able to convince anyone about anything. So, I told her that. Something like "Okay, I'll say this outright, even if that's unusual. I will not hire you, and I'd like to tell you why", and then explained that in their CV they mention this this and that, and those are actually cool things to have done and would need to be advertised. And continued: "You would not find enough donors to cover a reasonable part of your salary costs, and you'd be more of a burden for the organization than an asset. There are laws about how much of an NGOs costs can go for its own organization, and for your part the percentage would be far too high. You would feel guilty for wasting a good organization's funds and endangering their permission to gather donations, and your life would be worse because of that guilt. Maybe in some years you'll develop the skills you need for this job and should apply again, but now is not the time for that. I seriously wish you good luck finding a summer job! You've got a good attitude for a worker and there are companies that would really need the likes of you, but you're not cut out for stuff related to sales yet."
Sounds a lot like how all borders of Latvia felt like just five years ago or so. A lot of the maps they use for any planning work have just plain white colour outside the borders, so after the last village there's just the border, and then... nothing.
So, once you were beyond the last village inside Latvia, there was of course no point in properly maintaining the roads. You are sitting in a bus, somewhat slumbering. Suddenly the ride becomes very uneven and you look through the window to see commas over and under half of the consonants in viļļaģe ņames :) (plus a lot of That only lasts for about five minutes, though.
And the same when exiting Latvia: bumpy road for five minutes, then the bumpiness ends and the villäges are pülling öff shenänigäns with double dots, or, alternatively, there's suddenly a lot of poop ųndęrnęąth lęttęrs. (Okay, in reality a Lithuanian letter only knows how to poop when in the beginning or end of a word)
It's a clever way to say "welcome to our co-o-o-ountr-r-r-r-r-y"! Boringly, some years ago that feature was removed, but I expect things to normalize in 10 years time. Estonia and Lithuania will maintain their roads also at the borders, but Latvia only in the relevant parts of the country, not at the outer limit of existence. Until the condition of the road to nowhere gets too ridiculous and they have to – exceptionally and begrudgingly – repair even those unnecessary pieces of road.
(And yes, this did also apply to the transcontinental road used by trucks going from Finland to Poland and Germany and further to, well, anywhere.)
I'll try to remember to address the rest of your comment later tonight, but one things I want to mention now: it's not really a competition. If one is better than the other, it's only a good thing for both.
And then, people don't really look very much at what is technically better than something else.
I'm on Lemmy and I've got stuff here. It's definitely good enough, so I'm not going to migrate anywhere. People land at whatever some they land at, and unless that one is actually bad, they are unlikely to change for something else.
Is there a reason to transfer it, really? Just create a new one on another instance. I mean, here's my first account: https://feddit.org/u/Tuuktuuk , because I didn't know about Lemmy when I joined it, but then figured that a German-language instance is a bit of a bad idea for a Finn. And now I'm on Sopuli.
Is there something about your current account thar really requires you to transfer the account? (And, for what I know: I don't think there is a transfer functionality of any kind.)
If you make more money, then you have a larger share of all the money in circulation. That means, you are devaluating everyone else's savings and pretty much gaining some of their money.
And there's some system where people who have joined through you, somehow also produce to you some small percentage of the money they mine. So, the ones who got in first are getting richer and richer out of others' work.
How is Lemmy's code actually licensed? If it's GPL or somesuch, someone can just fork it and add the missing features. There's some amount of work needed for keeping up to changes in Lemmy's main branch, but it's still reasonably easy work. (Assuming you can code, of course 😀)
EDIT: The licence is this one: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/GNU_Affero_General_Public_License
Almost nothing is ever really done on any filesystem when you press "delete". The only thing is that those physical parts of the disk with the "deleted" file are marked as "not in use". The data is there still unchanged, until you save something else and that spot on the disk is the first free spot available for saving that new file.
So, if you accidentally delete files, make sure that nothing gets saved on that disk anymore, not even by the OS. So, either unmount the disk, or cut the power to your computer, or whatever. Then learn how to mount hard drives as read-only and how to mark the "not in use" spots on your disk as "this spot contains this file".
This is why proper deletion of files always includes filling the disk with random data. As long as nothing has been written on top of where the file was (and in reality: still is), it's still there. Only access to it has been removed, but that access can be regained. Been there, done that.
What kind of numbers are you going after?
I mean, probably you want numbers to prove that climate change is changing politics and economics, etc. for the worse, or maybe just numbers for proving that climate change is real.
But both of these seem like such trivial information that I'm probably just guessing wrong. But because of that, I'd be curious to know: what kind of numbers did you mean?
I can probably help digging up some for you, but not if you just meant "prove that climate change exists". But, numbers proving that economy will suffer from climate change should be easy to find. (And I think you could just search for them yourself...)
My children are still very young, but oh are they happy!
They are enjoying their life and no future suffering will ever take that away from them.
I wouldn't want to deny those awesome humans their right to play as merrily as they do. To create, to enjoy life. They exist right now as well, in 2025 and 2026.
The end of life is always painful. Life is still worth it.
Actually they'll inherit from tens of grandparents. You don't inherit your grandparent, except if your own parent has already died.
Typically, you inherit from your grandparents by your parents having.inherited from them and you later inheriting from your parents.
That is not a new phenomenon.
It would make sense that developers would support their game as played through Proton, which is not really that different from just making a proper linux-native game. It should work just as fast both ways.
Probably he does, but at the moment his support is strong enough by enough of margin that it's clear he'd win an election anyway if it was held now, so this is kind of moot.
(And then he'd be the president for the next half a decade, which might be already right after the end of the war no longer what the people in Ukraine want)
I think it's a bit of a stupid rule to have in your constitution, and I think it was probably written before 2014 when Ukraine stepped into democracy (or even before 2008, when it started seriously heading towards proper democracy). But as bad as I find the rule, it's currently in the constitution and wasn't added by Zelensky.
It does make sense that at a time like this you do live according to the constitution. Organizing elections would be against the Ukrainian constitution, and it would be a bigger problem with democracy to break the constitution than it is to postpone an election.
Especially since in the current situation an election would be massively unrepresentative. (What do you do with a mail-in election when the Russia destroys the whole warehouse where the ballots, or at least the ballots from a whole province, are stored?)
Pälä-pälä-pälä in Finnish.
ä marks the sound marked with "a" in "cat".
The right is typically for gun control. Only one country comes to my mind where they aren't. Which one were you thinking about? Or is it more common than I thought?
(Or did you just happen to forget that 95 % of Earth's population exists?)
EDIT: Oh, and also: It is important to keep in mind that it's the same within the left. There are also left-wingers who prefer authoritarianism and ones who despise it. I do agree with your sentiment: The left-right division does not work very well in our current world. Need to take best parts of everything, but most importantly, make sure we don't end up under totalitarian rule!