Yeah, I had a previous job that contracted with the Army, and thus we had access to NIPRnet. The policy was that once a device such as a laptop was set up to access it, it was never to be plugged in to a civilian network ever again, and completely wiped and destroyed at the end of its life.
These numbnuts just waltz in with their own box, plug it in, and everything's fine and dandy? WTF.
I don't think any of our classical open licenses from the 80s and 90s were ever created with AI in mind. They are inadequate. An update or new one is needed.
Stallman, spit out the toe cheese and get to work.
It's art. It's not real, and it's not hurting anybody in real life. We shouldn't ban things because they make you uncomfortable, we ban them when they harm actual people.
Edit: this is in no way an endorsement of that particular fetish. I personally think it's sick and disgusting. But it's not my place to tell someone else not to enjoy it if nobody was harmed in its production.
It can do that just fine, because it has seen enough examples of working code. It can't directly count correctly, sure, but it can write "i++;", incrementing a variable by one in a loop and returning the result. The computer running the generated program is going to be doing the counting.
I suppose if you're staying in a high level like JS, yeah, but if you're sitting there defining the width of your types with stuff like uint16_t or int32_t, you probably want to be using the former system.
That will be a problem for sites that are all hosted on one IP address where the server figures out what site you want by the client's request string.