Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)T
Posts
1
Comments
49
Joined
3 yr. ago

  • It's a microphone, not a chatbot. It's for controlling smart home stuff, turning on lights, checking the weather, playing music, adjusting the air conditioning, etc. Without having to have spyware from some shitty tech company in your house.

    This thing itself doesn't have the brains though, you have to plug it into something else that does the home assistant stuff.

    You could use an LLM to give it a more natural interface but you could run one locally so it's not going to openai etc.

  • One thing you gotta remember when dealing with that kind of situation is that Claude and Chat etc. are often misaligned with what your goals are.

    They aren't really chat bots, they're just pretending to be. LLMs are fundamentally completion engines. So it's not really a chat with an ai that can help solve your problem, instead, the LLM is given the equivalent of "here is a chat log between a helpful ai assistant and a user. What do you think the assistant would say next?"

    That means that context is everything and if you tell the ai that it's wrong, it might correct itself the first couple of times but, after a few mistakes, the most likely response will be another wrong answer that needs another correction. Not because the ai doesn't know the correct answer or how to write good code, but because it's completing a chat log between a user and a foolish ai that makes mistakes.

    It's easy to get into a degenerate state where the code gets progressively dumber as the conversation goes on. The best solution is to rewrite the assistant's answers directly but chat doesn't let you do that for safety reasons. It's too easy to jailbreak if you can control the full context.

    The next best thing is to kill the context and ask about the same thing again in a fresh one. When the ai gets it right, praise it and tell it that it's an excellent professional programmer that is doing a great job. It'll then be more likely to give correct answers because now it's completing a conversation with a pro.

    There's a kind of weird art to prompt engineering because open ai and the like have sunk billions of dollars into trying to make them act as much like a "helpful ai assistant" as they can. So sometimes you have to sorta lean into that to get the best results.

    It's really easy to get tricked into treating like a normal conversation with a person when it's actually really... not normal.

  • "No worries!" means "Yes, that's fine, there is nothing to worry about."

    He thought it meant "No! You should worry about that!"

  • Friendship drive charging...

  • I feel like this a cultural thing because that sounds wild to me.

    The penalty for burglary where I am is not death, nor am I a judge or executioner.

    We've been broken into a lot and it's usually just some poor asshole who wants to steal things to buy meth. It's horrible and scary and feels like a massive violation but shooting someone in that scenario just feels like straight up murder.

  • Not American, or really knowledgeable about it but from the outside, I think this looks like ordinary politicking.

    IVF is a proxy war for abortion. Dems want the talking point that abortion bans hurt/block IVF. Republicans/Trump want to remove that talking point by saying they love IVF "we want more babies right?" and will support laws to protect it as a separate and unrelated issue to abortion.

    Dems put forward a bill that not only protects it but makes insurance companies pay for it. Trump is fine with that because it benefits him but Republicans in Congress get big money from insurance lobbyists and so they can't vote for it. They also have fears that they'll piss off their homophobic supporters by making them pay for something the gays might use (insurance costs will go up to help someone who isn't me!").

    Republicans put forward another bill that protects IVF without hurting their insurance company buddies but the Dems block it. Republicans then have to vote against the IVF bill and the Dems can now say "see! They really don't care about reproductive rights at all!"

    Feels a bit like nobody involved actually cares about IVF at all and just wants votes and lobbyist money.

    In case this take comes across too centrist: Republicans and Trump are really quite shit.

  • Yep, and even when talking about living things it's not a clear distinction.

    In biology, poison is a substance that causes harm when an organism is exposed to it. Venom is a poison that enters the body through a sting or bite. In a bunch of medical fields though, poisons only apply to toxins that are ingested or absorbed through the skin and that definition sometimes carries across to zoology.

    Venomous creatures are poisonous by most definitions because venom is a poison. But if the distinction is useful in a medical or zoological context then they're not.

    tldr: The pedantry of eg. correcting someone who says a snake is poisonous is totally pointless and mostly wrong.

  • Hmmm...

    That looks pretty paywally to me. That said, I'm all for people supporting independent media.