Skip Navigation

InitialsDiceBearhttps://github.com/dicebear/dicebearhttps://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/„Initials” (https://github.com/dicebear/dicebear) by „DiceBear”, licensed under „CC0 1.0” (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/)S
Posts
272
Comments
1076
Joined
1 yr. ago

  • They see McCarthy's mistake was giving up.

  • I understood that reference. My god I'm old.

  • Perhaps we need to review who really needs to be denaturalized and deported.

    "If only, if only," the woodpecker sighs . . ..

  • It does encroach, but they'll still go for the ban.

  • Sort of.

    SCOTUS generally allows for time, place, and manner restrictions so long as there is reasonable alternatives provided. So, governments can restrict speech with noise ordinances at a reasonable hour (can't be blaring an anti-war protest at 2:30 a.m. in a residential neighborhood or can't block fire exits with a crowd of protesters) if the person(s) protesting is/are given a viable alternative. Also, child porn doesn't enjoy the same First Amendment protections as regular pornographic materials.

    But, other than that, you're generally correct.

  • They might well have just made a place to “store” people while they wait to legally deport them.

    That's actually what the Nazis' extermination camp started as. Dachau (opened 22 March 1933) was origionally a deportation camp. As things progressed (they couldn't find anywhere to deport the Jews to and the war was taking a turn against them on the Eastern Front) they evolved into extermination camps after the Wannsee Conference in '41. It's why it was called the FINAL Solution.

  • Deleted

    Permanently Deleted

    Jump
  • Oh great: one more AI to disable.

  • then we could weaponize it against Trump supporters

    Believe me, it really seems that this bill demonstrates that the only good Republican is a dead Republican. But, they're running the show without much of a violent push-back. So, it's best not to give them ideas.

    Also, weaponizing a federal law against Trump supporters at the federal level implies that he's going to give up power. We saw how that went last time.

  • I think it wouldn't stand an Article III challenge because it denies the courts' ability to hear the cases and controversies that arise out of the 4th, 5th, and 6th Amendments.

  • That means this bill has to define socialism.

    It's not meant to have a definition. That's why the proposed law denies judicial review. The "definition" is supposed to be whatever the ICE Officer(s) Gestapo wants it to be.

  • Gulags for ideological differences thats right up their alley. But there is no chance this passes?

    They're already building the camps. They won't be just for immigrants for long. They're so big and there's so many. You don't make that kind of a long-term investment for a short-term problem. They'll round up their other undesirables to put in them too.

  • I hate living here.