Let people be excited about this if they want, I don't think it will matter that much tbh.
Let other people suggest Linux to their friends as an alternative, maybe some of them stick to using it, while others just conclude it's crap and move on.
You should really wonder why you get so upset from this though, it seems to cause you real harm that people might be wrong on the internet.
Whatever you think about drugs and their legality doesn't really matter when you look at how the legal system is applied here. As previous poster stated, this just shows that the legal system is broken as hell and only applies when used to control the common person.
Easy, it's actually hard enough to join Lemmy in comparison to the other sites, that I don't believe the masses will ever flood here.
That isn't necessarily a bad thing, althought I still have to follow my favourite projects on discord and reddit . Since they are publishing for the masses
The bad thing about those kind of shows, is that while most people see that as a warning, and something to avoid.
Some people immediately start charting a path to how to make it a reality, and sometimes those people are very very smart and can chart a path that might take decades.
I say this while on the toilet, writing on a device that has cameras both front and back, always on microphones and location sensors, and facial recognition and 3D scanning equipment.
When the personalized condom ads start popping up, I will only be slightly annoyed.
If you sit in a room and you can see the bars, you know you are trapped, if you sit in a room, but you cant see the bars, you are going to think you are free
It really is, knowingly supporting someone who is openly evil, is obviously worse than unknowingly supporting someone who is evil, but tries to hide it.
We should not let people be openly evil, it just feels like a real stupid move.
I like the idea, but I don't really feel this is scoring decentralization at all.
Yeah,looking through this again, it really scores centralization, and also focuses way to much on ease of setup. Which honestly has nothing to do with it. If it's super hard to setup, but every participant is hosting their own node. And producing the same amount of content. That would be max decentralization.
I would also argue that a requirement for decentralization is that the service keeps working even if a large portion of all nodes goes down, the remaining nodes are still operational and keep delivering the value.
Let people be excited about this if they want, I don't think it will matter that much tbh.
Let other people suggest Linux to their friends as an alternative, maybe some of them stick to using it, while others just conclude it's crap and move on.
You should really wonder why you get so upset from this though, it seems to cause you real harm that people might be wrong on the internet.