Skip Navigation

Posts
1
Comments
506
Joined
3 yr. ago

Stone Mason, Canadian ExPat living in the UK, Hobbyist musician.

  • Oh yeah....for well over a decade. If you're REALLY lucky the proprietary form factor m.2 is user replaceable and not just sad bits soldered direct to the PCB. (Edit: I really really hate Autoassume, that's supposed to be "SSD bits"... I'll leave it as is because it's funny)

    My wife has a 2017 MacBook Air, at some point in the last few years it stopped getting system and security updates. She didn't notice until she got a pop-up from Chrome saying that her OS is no longer supported. Completely ignored it until around October last year when some websites stopped working and gave an error indicating out of date certificates.(There's a lot in those last 3 sentences that is wildly troubling to me.....)Took me from October until mid-January to convince her to TRY Linux. So I went to buy her a new m.2....and paid an extra £20 on top of standard because of the proprietary form factor. Luckily I bought before the major price hikes....got a 256gb m(ac).2 for ~£90. Would have just backed up her files and wiped the original drive but she wanted to be able to switch back to her exact installation if she didn't like Linux...and the new drive is double the capacity 👍

  • Hey... people win the lotto all the time! So for brief moments throughout the day there's probably 101-107 people in the world who can still afford one!

  • Already had a read through it this morning. Seems like some few not too bad ideas mixed through with quite a lot of poorly thought out ones.

  • Or switch to one of the growing number of Linux distros who have taken the stance of "not a fucking chance are we complying with that idiocy" and then just hope where you live doesn't pass a law like this and those distros are forced to region block downloads for you 👍

    There's also the worry that if enough places push something like this through, could end up being a case of a vast swath of the internet will just refuse to work without receiving an approved "Age Assurance Signal"....

    Or the bigger worry that this is the beginning of the end of proper human interaction with the internet. Access and child protection laws become so strict that only chat bot agents are legally authorised to use the internet and we all become beholden to these programs for everything from looking up a recipe to requesting access to research papers to help support your masters thesis or fucking whatever.

  • Honestly? I've done a lot of looking over the last few days and he's literally the only person I've found talking about the Brazilian law coming into effect in 12 days. If you have seen any coverage from anyone else, I would be really interested if you could pass a link my way.

  • Well said! That's basically exactly my thoughts on the issue.

  • I mean, the claims as I understand them, is that the government is subsidising these EVs and Solar-PV etc. to the point where they are being sold below cost of manufacturing. Making any competition next to impossible in any countries where parts supply chains are more costly than in China. Not sure I believe that to the extent claimed, but they definitely are, very clearly and without hiding it, heavily subsidising these industries. Without someone smarter with numbers than me and very trustworthy looking at the actual flow of money from the government to these companies? There's no way to actually know what is in fact happening.

  • the fundamental difference is they saw a long term transition, welcomed it, guided it. Whereas us sees a long term transition, pulls our head into our shell

    That's one of the advantages of having a single party in power for a very long time, I don't think China qualifies as a proper dictatorship, but it shares the advantage of the ability to plan decades in advance. The US is hobbled by the 4-8 year cycle of the next person totally erasing all the work of the previous. So there's an incentive for whoever is in power to keep the status quo and keep any changes small enough or "bipartisan" enough that the next person doesn't repeal it.

    I wouldn't necessarily say that from what's visible outside the information confines of the CCP is cheating. They have a well defined goal, and no sight of the end of party rule means they can effectively do whatever they want to achieve it.

  • Are the subsidies specifically for destroying foreign markets? (😈MWAHAHAHAHAHAHA!)

    Maybe, maybe not. I'm not a huge fan of the Chinese government, but I don't think their subsidies program are intended to directly destroy foreign markets so much as put the country at the forefront of development and production... which can be perceived as the above.

    In depth study of the Chinese GreenTech subsidy system.

    As the study goes into in depth, tax credits are just one part of the system. There's also direct subsidies(funding) for R&D, which is understandably very expensive, and below market value land sales among other things. In 2019 China put the equivalent of 1.73% of their GDP into industrial support, with below market land sales being a substantial portion of that. Next highest on the graphic is Korea at 0.67% GDP equivalent.

    Moving away from the subsidies thing.

    China has the battery production technologies and capabilities, the electric motor production, an unbelievable economy of scale, and insane levels of automation in their EV Factories,

    (Found this out awhile ago when I was watching a video on how actually ridiculous the whole US - Greenland thing was.)

    China has ~90% of the rare earth refinement capacity. Even if Trump wants/wanted Greenland for it's resources, it would be over a decade to spin up enough refinement infrastructure to process whatever they would hypothetically extract.

    China has invested HEAVILY in the entire supply chain from resource extraction to final product for a wide swath of GreenTech. When a lot of the rest of the world has switched from a majority production/export to majority consumption/import economy, or focused on soft products/research/etc of course they would see a country flooding their markets with products as adversarial. Regardless of if those foreign products are superior. Especially if the government of said foreign country is often interfering in political processes, intimidating other countries citizens, setting up extra judicial secret police networks in many countries, economic coercion....etc etc etc.

    I'm not entirely convinced that the subsidy system is malicious, but the CCP isn't above playing dirty. So I can fully understand the common reaction being that it is.

  • With help from companies and people who have a vested interest in creating a panopticon-esque surveillance state.

    First sentence of the last paragraph.

  • No worries 👍

    It's one of those things I feel like anyone with a young person in their life should be aware of.

  • @lastlybutfirstly@lemmy.world

    The people at the top certainly don't. There IS absolutely large swaths of the government that definitely do. Even if only subconsciously, all (or most) government workers who use a workplace computer of some kind should understand that sites are able to be blocked. They might think you'd need to be a Grey Beard of the 16th Order to set it up, but I'd wager a fair percentage have tried to go to a site and it's been blacklisted.

  • People have been forgetting that home routers come with something called parental controls.

    When my wife and I first signed up with Virgin as our ISP there was parental control turned on by default. Had to put in my credit card info to be able to flap.(Edit: Goddamn Autoassume! FAP not FLAP) This was 2021ish? So before the current stupidity.

    Also, it's easy to feel like this is all being pushed by parents who just straight up refuse to properly parent their children...but it's mostly being championed by Puritan lobby/pressure groups. They think even totally consensual, CIS/HET amateur porn is disgusting and sinful. They don't want to see, so they're on a mission to make it so literally no one can see it.With help from companies and people who have a vested interest in creating a panopticon-esque surveillance state. And the rest of the people involved in passing it are too old or ignorant or paid too well by the other two groups to stand in the way of it, or to have cut out the really egregious shit from these bills before they were passed.

  • Good shout. I'll have a look 💪

  • SWEET!

  • I like the vibe buddy. 💖

  • I usually switch to new after scrolling the first 5 or 6 posts. Just too lazy to switch my defaults

  • 💪 sorting by 🕑 New because 🔥 Hot was all read

  • Sweet.....