Interesting. I was fighting with KDEs implementation of ddc today because it's fucking crashing my power management system when the monitors go to sleep. I didn't realize it went that far back.
and you just read what someone else tells you and take it as gospel even when they give you the opportunity to see their reasoning, which is well laid out on the mediabiasfactcheck page
You on the other hand need to work on your media literacy skills, because you claimed it was AI at the get-go and here we are, the video is authentic, and you still can't admit you were wrong.
You're the one who has decided I am doing that instead of actually addressing any of my points. Your claim that it was AI and the video is authentic. That they have low credibility but that low credibility is related to their bias, not to outright making shit up. That's shifting goalposts, dear.
I was never taken in, I just don't dismiss a source when there is no evidence that the facts they produce are you know, facts. This video is authentic. It's up to individuals to decide what they hear, it's also why audio forensics would help.
I live with and caretake for family members, trust me, I spent a lot of time with them in the pool today already.
I'm getting upset lmao dude, sorry that you're desperately trying to ragebait me. Sorry that calling a fucking moron a fucking moron makes people think you're mad lmao
Snopes confirmed the video's authenticity with the videographer who shot it. However, the audio was too distorted to definitively confirm the specifics of the conversation.
Man you and this conservative media outlet have a lot in common with MISREPRESENTING FACTS
Snopes confirmedthe video's authenticity with the videographer who shot it. However, the audio was too distorted to definitively confirm the specifics of the conversation.
Even Snopes says its authentic you fucking moron, but I guess it's "nothing more than AI" whatever.
You keep repeating the low credibility but you refuse to read with or engage with WHY they got that rating, and it wasn't for not presenting facts or making shit up, its purely ideological and how they PRESENT facts.
So how are they PRESENTING this that is making it biased? When they make a full report on it I expect it to be DEEPLY biased, but the video on it's own is very likely real. I'm happy to be proven wrong.
But I think you just read LOW CREDIBILITY and your brain shuts off and you cant suss out that there's a difference between actually presenting fake journalism and fake stories versus deeply misrepresenting what those facts mean. They got low credibility for BIAS, not FACTS.
Sorry I bothered to read their fucking reasoning and you won't
I mean, things take time. The Drudge Report wasn't wrong about Monica, he was just an asshole. Assholes can be right and still refer to facts but present those facts in a different ideological context.
but I clearly was never going to get through to you.
I've made a device which makes you read this in your head, in my voice!