Marilyn Monroe singing Happy Birthday Mr. President comes to mind as well.
I don't know why people want to pin it on party rather than people with power often exploit that power for sexual attraction. It's a power and control thing, not a party thing.
Many were increasingly of the opinion that they’d all made a big mistake in making text editors in the first place. And some said that even making operating systems had been a bad move, and that no one should ever have built computers at all.
This baby boy is 26, meaning he was 25 when these comments were made. Anyone acting like this problem will go away when the elderly bigots begin to die off is a fool. Further, as he is a Democratic Socialist, it's just one more for the pile of evidence that the LGBTQ+ community could never and still can't count on "the left" for support and representation.
The fact that the US has turned literally everything into something you can gamble on really shows how much of a failure of a society the US truly is.
The social contract has been dead for 50 years and yet people younger than fifty still out there acting like nothings wrong, and all you need to do is "get a better job" and everything will be fine.
Man I'm not sure getting a better job is gonna help me escape climate change exacerbated wildfires, nor the gambling markets that incentivize arson.
I learned a decent bit about how biometric authentication works (or at least this specific implementation) by installing, setting up, and tweaking settings for Biopass. I also learned about how when you do first login using this method, it can fail to unlock keyrings because the password authentication has been bypassed so no password has been provided to unlock the keyring. It includes anti-spoofing local AI models, and the dev plans to have the option for the user to download and use any model for anti-spoofing/recognition. Interesting stuff.
and providing you take into account that it cannot plan ahead for contingencies or consider negative possible outcomes. they have no sense of the past or the future, existing entirely within the moment of a prompt.
It's path down the hill was algorithmically determined but it's actually a black box so I can't tell you why it followed the path it did at all actually.
Yeah, this "similar enough sounding domain name" tactic is far from new, and they must just be using new SEO tricks to get their sites to surface to users, that or illegitimate ad services promoting them.
The privacy community has a pretty favorable view of System1:
For sure, but this was last updated May 2022.
So here's the thing, it's admirable when companies do this, but the reality is that the whims and desires of the parent company can change in an instant. Sure, it's privacy focused now. Can we be assured of that in five, ten, fifteen years? There are zero guarantees for this sort of thing. Especially for a "special purpose acquisition company."
It's essentially something that should be under endless audit under all the companies claiming good privacy policies, how willing they are to stick to their guns instead of giving in for profit.
Because it always can and will change so we must "Trust, but verify" at all times.
You could have fooled me with all the establishment democrats backing Andrew Cuomo (a sex pest) over Zohran Mamdani.